|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
NV US President - D Caucus
|
Parents |
> United States > Nevada > President
|
Parent Race | US President - D Primaries |
Office | President |
Honorific | President - Abbr: President |
Type | Democratic Primary Election |
Filing Deadline | January 01, 2020 - 04:00pm Central |
Polls Open | February 22, 2020 - 12:00pm Central |
Polls Close | February 22, 2020 - 03:00pm Central |
Term Start | January 20, 2021 - 12:00pm |
Term End | January 20, 2025 - 12:00pm |
Contributor | RBH |
Last Modified | NCdem April 23, 2024 05:37pm |
Data Sources | [Link]
[Link] |
Description |
This Race page and map reports the "Final Alignment" results.
"First Alignment" results appear on the "Ballot Round 0" line.
Closed Caucus.
36 pledged delegates.
|
|
|
|
CANDIDATES |
|
|
Photo | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Sen.
Bernie Sanders |
Vice President
Joe Biden |
Mayor
Pete Buttigieg |
Sen.
Elizabeth Warren |
Sen.
Amy Klobuchar |
Tom Steyer |
Uncommitted |
Party | Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Campaign Logo | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertified Votes | 41,075 (40.45%) |
19,179 (18.89%) |
17,598 (17.33%) |
11,703 (11.53%) |
7,376 (7.26%) |
4,120 (4.06%) |
367 (0.36%) |
Margin | 0 (0.00%) |
-21,896 (-21.56%) |
-23,477 (-23.12%) |
-29,372 (-28.93%) |
-33,699 (-33.19%) |
-36,955 (-36.39%) |
-40,708 (-40.09%) |
Predict Avg. | 29.00% |
22.00% |
13.00% |
14.00% |
5.00% |
7.00% |
0.00% |
Ballot Round 0 |
35,652 (33.48%) |
18,424 (17.30%) |
16,102 (15.12%) |
13,438 (12.62%) |
11,703 (10.99%) |
9,503 (8.92%) |
472 (0.44%) |
|
Cash On Hand |
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
Website |
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
|
|
Entry Date |
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
01/01/2020
|
Bar | |
|
Adj Poll Avg | 27.28%-- |
16.44%-- |
12.76%-- |
11.48%-- |
8.68%-- |
11.72%-- |
0.00%-- |
Data for Progress 02/19/20-02/21/20 |
35.00% -- |
16.00% 2.0 |
15.00% -- |
16.00% -- |
8.00% 1.0 |
8.00% 2.0 |
0.00% -- |
AtlasIntel 02/19/20-02/21/20 |
38.00% -- |
11.00% -- |
14.00% -- |
9.00% -- |
5.00% -- |
11.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Emerson College 02/19/20-02/20/20 |
30.40% -- |
16.10% -- |
16.90% -- |
12.10% -- |
11.00% -- |
9.80% -- |
0.00% -- |
Point Blank Political 02/13/20-02/15/20 |
13.00% -- |
14.30% -- |
12.60% -- |
7.10% -- |
15.60% -- |
18.60% -- |
0.00% -- |
Beacon Research (D) 02/12/20-02/15/20 |
24.00% -- |
19.00% -- |
13.00% -- |
10.00% -- |
7.00% -- |
18.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Data for Progress 02/12/20-02/15/20 |
35.00% -- |
14.00% -- |
15.00% -- |
16.00% -- |
9.00% -- |
10.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
|
Endorsements | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORE CANDIDATES |
|
|
Photo | |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Andrew Yang |
Sen.
Michael Bennet |
Rep.
Tulsi Gabbard |
Gov.
Deval L. Patrick |
Rep.
John K. Delaney |
|
Party | Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
|
Campaign Logo | |
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertified Votes | 49 (0.05%) |
36 (0.04%) |
32 (0.03%) |
8 (0.01%) |
0 (0.00%) |
|
Margin | -41,026 (-40.40%) |
-41,039 (-40.42%) |
-41,043 (-40.42%) |
-41,067 (-40.44%) |
-41,075 (-40.45%) |
|
Predict Avg. | 0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Ballot Round 0 |
612 (0.58%) |
140 (0.13%) |
353 (0.33%) |
86 (0.08%) |
1 (0.00%) |
|
Cash On Hand |
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
|
Website |
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
|
Entry Date |
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
00/00/2020
|
|
|
Adj Poll Avg | 4.31%-- |
0.50%-- |
2.08%-- |
0.00%-- |
0.50%-- |
|
Data for Progress 02/19/20-02/21/20 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
2.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
AtlasIntel 02/19/20-02/21/20 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
3.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Emerson College 02/19/20-02/20/20 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
1.90% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Point Blank Political 02/13/20-02/15/20 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
1.70% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Beacon Research (D) 02/12/20-02/15/20 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Data for Progress 02/12/20-02/15/20 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
2.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
|
Endorsements | |
|
|
|
|
|
| DROPPED OUT - NO VOTES |
|
|
Michael R. "Mike" Bloomberg (D)
00, 2020
|
Cory Booker (D)
00, 2020 -
00, 2020
|
Julián Castro (D)
00, 2020
|
Marianne Williamson (D)
00, 2020 -
00, 2020
|
Kamala Harris (D)
Dec 03, 2019
|
Steve Bullock (D)
Dec 02, 2019
|
Joseph A. Sestak (D)
Dec 01, 2019
|
Wayne M. Messam (D)
Nov 20, 2019
|
Beto O'Rourke (D)
Nov 01, 2019
|
Tim Ryan (D)
Oct 24, 2019
|
Bill de Blasio (D)
Sep 20, 2019
|
Kirsten Gillibrand (D)
Aug 28, 2019
|
Seth Moulton (D)
Aug 23, 2019
|
Jay Inslee (D)
Aug 21, 2019
|
John Hickenlooper (D)
Aug 15, 2019
|
Mike Gravel (D)
Aug 06, 2019
|
|
Start Date |
End Date |
Type |
Title |
Contributor |
| VIDEO ADVERTISEMENTS |
|
|
|
Start Date |
Candidate |
Category |
Ad Tone |
Lng |
Title |
Run Time |
Contributor |
|
| BOOKS |
|
|
Title |
Purchase |
Contributor |
| INFORMATION LINKS |
|
|
DISCUSSION |
[View All 29 Previous Messages] |
|
I:1038 | WA Indy ( 1790.9733 points)
|
Thu, February 13, 2020 04:36:07 PM UTC0:00
|
Warren
Warren
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Thu, February 13, 2020 09:09:13 PM UTC0:00
|
and after the stuff from the last day or so.. Culinary won't endorse.
Very productive last few days for everybody involved.
and after the stuff from the last day or so.. Culinary won't endorse.
Very productive last few days for everybody involved.
|
|
|
D:2109 | Ashley ( 5514.9624 points)
|
Thu, February 13, 2020 10:24:31 PM UTC0:00
|
If anybody has to guess. Who drops out after NV ?
Gabbard, with Warren as the wild card. I don’t think someone as rich as Steyer is bowing out this early, denial of New Hampshire rumors notwithstanding.
Tar Heel Conservative Dem: If anybody has to guess. Who drops out after NV ?
Gabbard, with Warren as the wild card. I don’t think someone as rich as Steyer is bowing out this early, denial of New Hampshire rumors notwithstanding.
|
|
|
Veg:334 | Thomas Walker ( 525.6817 points)
|
Fri, February 14, 2020 03:13:38 PM UTC0:00
|
I don't see anyone dropping out after Nevada.
Pete, Bernie, Amy and Bloomberg continue.
Steyer, Joe, and even Tulsi seem to be focusing on South Carolina - that is the state that will probably be the candidate graveyard.
Warren, I can't see dropping out before March 3 - with a last stand in Massachusetts and Oklahoma. When she loses those, like Anderson, Willkie and Brown did in Wisconsin, it will be bye bye time for her.
I don't see anyone dropping out after Nevada.
Pete, Bernie, Amy and Bloomberg continue.
Steyer, Joe, and even Tulsi seem to be focusing on South Carolina - that is the state that will probably be the candidate graveyard.
Warren, I can't see dropping out before March 3 - with a last stand in Massachusetts and Oklahoma. When she loses those, like Anderson, Willkie and Brown did in Wisconsin, it will be bye bye time for her.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Fri, February 14, 2020 06:56:04 PM UTC0:00
|
If Biden holds on and finishes 2nd, then at least he has something positive to point to going into SC/Super Tuesday.
This being a caucus, there is probably some complex math where the candidates between 10-14% are gonna throw the overall result into a loop. Although some of the result might depend on who is above 15% where.
Meaning Bernie could win the most county delegates, but also get fewer delegates in some places.
Like if there's 3 precincts with 9 delegates and Bernie loses all three by a 5-4 margin, but the 3 precincts are won by different candidates, so Sanders gets 12 delegates and everybody else gets 5 each out of 27.
If Warren drops before Super Tuesday, then I suspect it'll be because they're not confident in the MA result and want to avoid the blow of losing her state while still a candidate.
Oklahoma is just a complete wildcard, I have no idea what the people who still haven't switched their registration are gonna do there or if people living in Oklahoma have a special affinity to people who moved out of Oklahoma.
If Biden holds on and finishes 2nd, then at least he has something positive to point to going into SC/Super Tuesday.
This being a caucus, there is probably some complex math where the candidates between 10-14% are gonna throw the overall result into a loop. Although some of the result might depend on who is above 15% where.
Meaning Bernie could win the most county delegates, but also get fewer delegates in some places.
Like if there's 3 precincts with 9 delegates and Bernie loses all three by a 5-4 margin, but the 3 precincts are won by different candidates, so Sanders gets 12 delegates and everybody else gets 5 each out of 27.
If Warren drops before Super Tuesday, then I suspect it'll be because they're not confident in the MA result and want to avoid the blow of losing her state while still a candidate.
Oklahoma is just a complete wildcard, I have no idea what the people who still haven't switched their registration are gonna do there or if people living in Oklahoma have a special affinity to people who moved out of Oklahoma.
|
|
|
D:2109 | Ashley ( 5514.9624 points)
|
Sat, February 15, 2020 12:02:07 AM UTC0:00
|
Biden will run against Bernie and win
Or Biden will run against Warren and win that way too
Biden will run against Bernie and win
Or Biden will run against Warren and win that way too
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Sat, February 15, 2020 02:09:57 AM UTC0:00
|
a good portion of Biden's prospects kinda involve Bloomberg having a bad debate in NV and hoping that people getting cold feet on Bloomberg move back to Biden instead of just backing the national leader.
The one thing that would prevent any sort of contested convention is it would take some stomach to go through with it.
a good portion of Biden's prospects kinda involve Bloomberg having a bad debate in NV and hoping that people getting cold feet on Bloomberg move back to Biden instead of just backing the national leader.
The one thing that would prevent any sort of contested convention is it would take some stomach to go through with it.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Tue, February 18, 2020 07:52:54 PM UTC0:00
|
it's possible that Steyer not making the Wednesday debate could prove itself helpful to the whole "maybe Joe finishes 2nd in NV" thing.
it's possible that Steyer not making the Wednesday debate could prove itself helpful to the whole "maybe Joe finishes 2nd in NV" thing.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Thu, February 20, 2020 05:42:50 AM UTC0:00
|
a good portion of Biden's prospects kinda involve Bloomberg having a bad debate in NV and hoping that people getting cold feet on Bloomberg move back to Biden instead of just backing the national leader.
Well, I think Bloomberg had a bad debate. Or at the very best, a not-good debate.
The catch is executing part two of this plan.. which probably involves Biden finishing 2nd on Saturday.
I'd think the three most likely to finish 2nd are Biden, Buttigieg and Warren. Buttigieg was sorta bogged down on Wednesday and Warren showed signs of life.
It's possible there'll be more early votes than Saturday votes, just to mess with predictions here.
RBH: a good portion of Biden's prospects kinda involve Bloomberg having a bad debate in NV and hoping that people getting cold feet on Bloomberg move back to Biden instead of just backing the national leader.
Well, I think Bloomberg had a bad debate. Or at the very best, a not-good debate.
The catch is executing part two of this plan.. which probably involves Biden finishing 2nd on Saturday.
I'd think the three most likely to finish 2nd are Biden, Buttigieg and Warren. Buttigieg was sorta bogged down on Wednesday and Warren showed signs of life.
It's possible there'll be more early votes than Saturday votes, just to mess with predictions here.
|
|
|
I agree Bloomberg had a horrible debate last night. His body language was screaming "I don't want to be here".
I agree Bloomberg had a horrible debate last night. His body language was screaming "I don't want to be here".
|
|
|
D:7 | CA Pol Junkie ( 4947.9873 points)
|
Thu, February 20, 2020 04:53:50 PM UTC0:00
|
Well, I think Bloomberg had a bad debate. Or at the very best, a not-good debate.
Bloomberg was flogged, end of story.
The catch is executing part two of this plan.. which probably involves Biden finishing 2nd on Saturday.
Was Biden even at the debate?
I'd think the three most likely to finish 2nd are Biden, Buttigieg and Warren. Buttigieg was sorta bogged down on Wednesday and Warren showed signs of life.
Buttigieg had some good moments like when he simultaneously attacked Sanders and Bloomberg, but he shouldn't have picked a fight with Klobuchar. Warren was the standout, though, but with alot of people already having voted there might not be enough effect on the Nevada results.
It's possible there'll be more early votes than Saturday votes, just to mess with predictions here.
The assumption is that with the non-Sanders vote still splintered Sanders will get a plurality. I'm thinking Warren for 2nd place, but we are mostly blowing smoke if we think we know what will happen.
RBH: Well, I think Bloomberg had a bad debate. Or at the very best, a not-good debate.
Bloomberg was flogged, end of story.
RBH: The catch is executing part two of this plan.. which probably involves Biden finishing 2nd on Saturday.
Was Biden even at the debate?
RBH: I'd think the three most likely to finish 2nd are Biden, Buttigieg and Warren. Buttigieg was sorta bogged down on Wednesday and Warren showed signs of life.
Buttigieg had some good moments like when he simultaneously attacked Sanders and Bloomberg, but he shouldn't have picked a fight with Klobuchar. Warren was the standout, though, but with alot of people already having voted there might not be enough effect on the Nevada results.
RBH: It's possible there'll be more early votes than Saturday votes, just to mess with predictions here.
The assumption is that with the non-Sanders vote still splintered Sanders will get a plurality. I'm thinking Warren for 2nd place, but we are mostly blowing smoke if we think we know what will happen.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Fri, February 21, 2020 09:05:14 PM UTC0:00
|
suspecting it's possible Pete finishes 2nd, especially if there's a lot of older people who voted early
suspecting it's possible Pete finishes 2nd, especially if there's a lot of older people who voted early
|
|
|
D:7 | CA Pol Junkie ( 4947.9873 points)
|
Fri, February 21, 2020 10:16:09 PM UTC0:00
|
Pete overperformed in IA and NH, so my prediction is that he will again here:
Sanders 30%
Buttigieg 27%
Warren 18%
Biden 10%
Klobuchar 8%
Steyer 5%
Pete overperformed in IA and NH, so my prediction is that he will again here:
Sanders 30%
Buttigieg 27%
Warren 18%
Biden 10%
Klobuchar 8%
Steyer 5%
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Fri, February 21, 2020 10:28:18 PM UTC0:00
|
oh yeah, NV is doing the same first/final alignment thing as Iowa. Only nonviable candidates have to pick a viable candidate instead of having a chance to boost somebody up.
So I suspect that if one of Biden or Pete misses in a precinct, the other will benefit. Klobuchar will probably miss in most precincts and go to Joe/Pete despite Klobuchar hating Buttigieg.
There'll probably be a clear first/final alignment gap between Sanders in places where Warren is viable and places where she isn't.
I think the rules difference means that if there's a precinct with one viable candidate, the rest can just become uncommitted.
Anyways, Sanders best margin is probably first alignment. The rest could improve more on final alignment. I suspect the delegate alignment isn't going to be anything too wacky.
So as noted last week, there's a way to have something like three precincts of 9 delegates each where Sanders wins 4, another candidate wins 5, and Sanders wins 12-5-5-5 because the other candidates are splintered.
All in all, hopefully Harry Reid doesn't have to whoop too many people to make Nevada run better than Iowa.
oh yeah, NV is doing the same first/final alignment thing as Iowa. Only nonviable candidates have to pick a viable candidate instead of having a chance to boost somebody up.
So I suspect that if one of Biden or Pete misses in a precinct, the other will benefit. Klobuchar will probably miss in most precincts and go to Joe/Pete despite Klobuchar hating Buttigieg.
There'll probably be a clear first/final alignment gap between Sanders in places where Warren is viable and places where she isn't.
I think the rules difference means that if there's a precinct with one viable candidate, the rest can just become uncommitted.
Anyways, Sanders best margin is probably first alignment. The rest could improve more on final alignment. I suspect the delegate alignment isn't going to be anything too wacky.
So as noted last week, there's a way to have something like three precincts of 9 delegates each where Sanders wins 4, another candidate wins 5, and Sanders wins 12-5-5-5 because the other candidates are splintered.
All in all, hopefully Harry Reid doesn't have to whoop too many people to make Nevada run better than Iowa.
|
|
|
R:7114 | Kyle ( 752.3616 points)
|
Sat, February 22, 2020 09:54:16 PM UTC0:00
|
You know, I wasn't alive in 1972, but it will be interesting to watch George McGovern 2.0 lose in a landslide to the most corrupt president since Richard Nixon!
You know, I wasn't alive in 1972, but it will be interesting to watch George McGovern 2.0 lose in a landslide to the most corrupt president since Richard Nixon!
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Sun, February 23, 2020 01:25:22 AM UTC0:00
|
3 for 3.
Looking pretty good for Bernie so far...
3 for 3.
Looking pretty good for Bernie so far...
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Mon, February 24, 2020 06:35:35 PM UTC0:00
|
As long as you ignore their Warren number, Data for Progress did well with the other numbers.
Biden didn't finish 3rd, so that's helpful for him. Of course that he finished 2nd in a state where the winner won by double digits.
Buttigieg had over 15% in the alignments but will likely finish below 15% in delegates because of how badly he did in CD1 and CD4.
Of course Warren got to double digits and only shows up on the deviation map for one small county.
Klobuchar apparently concentrated efforts on Reno
Tom Steyer's result here suggests he might have problems beating his polls in SC.
Not sure how many results on the second row are holdouts and how many are data entry errors.
As long as you ignore their Warren number, Data for Progress did well with the other numbers.
Biden didn't finish 3rd, so that's helpful for him. Of course that he finished 2nd in a state where the winner won by double digits.
Buttigieg had over 15% in the alignments but will likely finish below 15% in delegates because of how badly he did in CD1 and CD4.
Of course Warren got to double digits and only shows up on the deviation map for one small county.
Klobuchar apparently concentrated efforts on Reno
Tom Steyer's result here suggests he might have problems beating his polls in SC.
Not sure how many results on the second row are holdouts and how many are data entry errors.
|
|
|
[View Next Page] |
|
|