|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
WI Supreme Court Justice
|
Parents |
> United States > Wisconsin > WI Supreme Court > Supreme Court Justice ('05)
|
Office | Supreme Court |
Honorific | Supreme Court - Abbr: Supreme Court Justice |
Type | Nonpartisan General Election |
Filing Deadline | January 01, 2025 - 12:00pm Central |
Polls Open | April 01, 2025 - 07:00am Central |
Polls Close | April 01, 2025 - 08:00pm Central |
Term Start | July 31, 2025 - 12:00pm |
Term End | July 31, 2035 - 12:00pm |
Contributor | RP |
Last Modified | ev April 02, 2025 07:44pm |
Data Sources | [Link] |
Description |
|
|
|
|
Start Date |
End Date |
Type |
Title |
Contributor |
 | VIDEO ADVERTISEMENTS |
 |
|
|
Start Date |
Candidate |
Category |
Ad Tone |
Lng |
Title |
Run Time |
Contributor |
|
 | BOOKS |
 |
|
Title |
Purchase |
Contributor |
 | INFORMATION LINKS |
|
|
|
Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
DISCUSSION |
[View All 14 Previous Messages] |
|
W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.6107 points)
|
Wed, April 2, 2025 11:37:39 AM UTC0:00
|
I get to explain to Republicans how bad this is for them.
Explain away LOL.
I have to wonder when Dems will realize that winning/overperforming in low-turnout specials and random off-year elections isn't as impressive as they make it seem. They've been bragging about it for years but the second a general election that people actually vote in comes around they don't do nearly as well as they do in specials (2022) or they end up underperforming expectations (2024). It's the exact same situation Republicans faced a decade ago, they won elections few people turned out for but bombed in higher-turnout environments. In other words, it's a turnout issue.
As for this race: If Wisconsin Rs want to win elections like these they need to make an effort to move them so they coincide with midterm/presidential elections. I believe this can be done if voters approve of it in a referendum but don't quote me on that. The electorate that turns out for these random April elections are obviously too hostile for Republicans to win over, they lost three times in a row by the exact same margin. At the very least Kinser would have won if a 2022-type of electorate turned out.
Campari_007: I get to explain to Republicans how bad this is for them.
Explain away LOL.
I have to wonder when Dems will realize that winning/overperforming in low-turnout specials and random off-year elections isn't as impressive as they make it seem. They've been bragging about it for years but the second a general election that people actually vote in comes around they don't do nearly as well as they do in specials (2022) or they end up underperforming expectations (2024). It's the exact same situation Republicans faced a decade ago, they won elections few people turned out for but bombed in higher-turnout environments. In other words, it's a turnout issue.
As for this race: If Wisconsin Rs want to win elections like these they need to make an effort to move them so they coincide with midterm/presidential elections. I believe this can be done if voters approve of it in a referendum but don't quote me on that. The electorate that turns out for these random April elections are obviously too hostile for Republicans to win over, they lost three times in a row by the exact same margin. At the very least Kinser would have won if a 2022-type of electorate turned out.
|
|
|
D:7 | CA Pol Junkie ( 5444.7002 points)
|
Wed, April 2, 2025 03:38:26 PM UTC0:00
|
As for this race: If Wisconsin Rs want to win elections like these they need to make an effort to move them so they coincide with midterm/presidential elections.
This election had over 80% of the turnout of the 2022 midterm. If Republicans want to win Supreme Court races, maybe they should try running candidates who aren't party stooges.
Arthur: As for this race: If Wisconsin Rs want to win elections like these they need to make an effort to move them so they coincide with midterm/presidential elections.
This election had over 80% of the turnout of the 2022 midterm. If Republicans want to win Supreme Court races, maybe they should try running candidates who aren't party stooges.
|
|
|
W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.6107 points)
|
Wed, April 2, 2025 04:11:12 PM UTC0:00
|
This election had over 80% of the turnout of the 2022 midterm.
Exactly, still a lower turnout than a midterm. Who do you suppose a majority of the remaining 20% that didn't vote would break for?
Also, saying 2022 and 2025 had a similar enough amount of voters doesn't prove that the electorate that turned out yesterday wasn't more D-favorable than the one that turned out in 2022.
If Republicans want to win Supreme Court races, maybe they should try running candidates who aren't party stooges.
Perhaps, but Democrats have run party stooges the past 3 court elections and it's worked out wonderfully for them. A squishy moderate R might have done better but I struggle to see how this hypothetical dream candidate could close a 10-point deficit.
CA Pol Junkie: This election had over 80% of the turnout of the 2022 midterm.
Exactly, still a lower turnout than a midterm. Who do you suppose a majority of the remaining 20% that didn't vote would break for?
Also, saying 2022 and 2025 had a similar enough amount of voters doesn't prove that the electorate that turned out yesterday wasn't more D-favorable than the one that turned out in 2022.
CA Pol Junkie: If Republicans want to win Supreme Court races, maybe they should try running candidates who aren't party stooges.
Perhaps, but Democrats have run party stooges the past 3 court elections and it's worked out wonderfully for them. A squishy moderate R might have done better but I struggle to see how this hypothetical dream candidate could close a 10-point deficit.
|
|
|
LPP:10973 | Patrick ( 6.5582 points)
|
Wed, April 2, 2025 05:56:15 PM UTC0:00
|
Exactly, still a lower turnout than a midterm. Who do you suppose a majority of the remaining 20% that didn't vote would break for?
Ah yes, the silent MAGA.
Arthur: Exactly, still a lower turnout than a midterm. Who do you suppose a majority of the remaining 20% that didn't vote would break for?
Ah yes, the silent MAGA.
|
|
|
|
|