|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
The Missing Men Attended the Global Test
|
Parent(s) |
Issue
|
Contributor | Tony82 |
Last Edited | Tony82 Oct 06, 2004 09:33pm |
Logged |
0
|
Category | Commentary |
News Date | Wednesday, October 6, 2004 06:00:00 AM UTC0:0 |
Description | From that quote the "Washington Post" concluded that:
Bremer's comments were striking because they echoed contentions of many
administration critics, including Democratic presidential nominee John F.
Kerry, who argue that the U.S. government failed to plan adequately to
maintain security in Iraq after the invasion.
Bremer's own interpretation of his own comments was rather different. He
claimed the coalition was shorthanded when it arrived in Baghdad.
"I believe that we currently have sufficient troop levels in
Iraq," he said in an e-mailed statement. He said all references in
recent speeches to troop levels related to the situation when he arrived in
Baghdad in May 2003 -- "and when I believed we needed either more
coalition troops or Iraqi security forces to address the looting."
Before we dismiss Bremer's statement as a belated attempt to split hairs and
return to the Party Line it is important to remember one simple fact. The US
arrived in Baghdad in May, 2003 minus nearly half the mechanized force intended
for the operation. The Fourth Infantry Division which was scheduled to
attack downward from Turkey and sweep through the Sunni heartland never arrived
in large part due to the opposition of countries like France in the Security
Council. Instead, it was forced to re-embark and ship around to the Gulf where
it marched north up the Tigris in the path of the 3rd Infantry Division. The 3rd
ID, for its part had to continue its attack north to partially subdue the towns
in the Sunni triangle. It was a double-whammy. |
Share |
|
2¢
|
|
Article | Read Full Article |
|
Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|