|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
IA US President - D Caucus
|
Parents |
> United States > Iowa > President
|
Parent Race | US President - D Primaries |
Office | President |
Honorific | President - Abbr: President |
Type | Democratic Primary Election |
Filing Deadline | February 03, 2020 - 12:00pm Central |
Polls Open | February 03, 2020 - 07:00pm Central |
Polls Close | February 03, 2020 - 08:00pm Central |
Term Start | January 20, 2021 - 12:00pm |
Term End | January 20, 2025 - 12:00pm |
Contributor | RBH |
Last Modified | RP July 22, 2022 04:41pm |
Data Sources | IDP: [Link]
First Alignment: [Link]
Final Alignment: [Link] |
Description |
This Race page and map reports the "Final Alignment" results.
"First Alignment" results appear on the "Ballot Round 0" line.
Closed Caucus.
49 pledged, 41 unpledged delegates.
15% viability threshold per precinct (to be able to receive support in the 'final realignment')
Three totals will be reported by the Iowa Democratic Party. The initial results ("first expression"), results after realignment ("final expression"), and the State Delegate Equivalent results (which determines delegate allocations)
State Delegate Equivalent (SDE) results:
Buttigieg | 563.207 |
Sanders | 563.127 |
Warren | 387.814 |
Biden | 339.632 |
Klobuchar | 263.827 |
Yang | 21.856 |
Steyer | 6.619 |
Gabbard | 0.114 |
|
|
|
|
CANDIDATES |
|
|
Photo | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Sen.
Bernie Sanders |
Mayor
Pete Buttigieg |
Sen.
Elizabeth Warren |
Vice President
Joe Biden |
Sen.
Amy Klobuchar |
Andrew Yang |
Uncommitted |
Party | Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Campaign Logo | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertified Votes | 45,831 (26.55%) |
43,273 (25.06%) |
34,932 (20.23%) |
23,631 (13.69%) |
21,120 (12.23%) |
1,759 (1.02%) |
1,451 (0.84%) |
Margin | 0 (0.00%) |
-2,558 (-1.48%) |
-10,899 (-6.31%) |
-22,200 (-12.86%) |
-24,711 (-14.31%) |
-44,072 (-25.53%) |
-44,380 (-25.70%) |
Predict Avg. | 27.14% |
16.02% |
12.38% |
24.36% |
7.80% |
1.93% |
0.00% |
Ballot Round 0 |
43,698 (24.75%) |
37,595 (21.29%) |
32,609 (18.47%) |
26,323 (14.91%) |
22,473 (12.73%) |
8,929 (5.06%) |
1,000 (0.57%) |
|
Cash On Hand |
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
Website |
[Website]
|
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
|
Entry Date |
00/00/2019
|
00/00/2019
|
00/00/2019
|
00/00/2019
|
00/00/2019
|
11/06/2017
|
00/00/0001
|
Bar | |
|
Adj Poll Avg | 22.33%-- |
16.86%-- |
15.86%-- |
19.13%-- |
9.85%-- |
3.86%-- |
0.00%-- |
Emerson College 01/30/20-02/02/20 |
28.00% 2.0 |
15.00% 5.0 |
14.00% 3.0 |
21.00% -- |
11.00% 2.0 |
5.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Data for Progress 01/28/20-02/02/20 |
22.00% -- |
18.00% -- |
19.00% -- |
18.00% -- |
9.00% -- |
6.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
David Binder Research 01/28/20-01/30/20 |
17.00% 3.0 |
19.00% 3.0 |
15.00% 3.0 |
15.00% 9.0 |
11.00% -- |
1.00% 2.0 |
0.00% -- |
American Research Group 01/27/20-01/30/20 |
23.00% -- |
9.00% -- |
15.00% -- |
17.00% -- |
16.00% -- |
5.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Civiqs 01/26/20-01/29/20 |
28.00% 4.0 |
15.00% 2.0 |
21.00% 2.0 |
15.00% -- |
8.00% 3.0 |
5.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Park Street Strategies (PSS) 01/24/20-01/28/20 |
18.00% -- |
17.00% -- |
17.00% -- |
20.00% -- |
12.00% -- |
5.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
|
Endorsements | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORE CANDIDATES |
|
|
Photo | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Tom Steyer |
Others |
Mayor
Michael R. "Mike" Bloomberg |
Rep.
Tulsi Gabbard |
Sen.
Michael Bennet |
Gov.
Deval L. Patrick |
Rep.
John K. Delaney |
Party | Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Democratic |
Campaign Logo | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertified Votes | 413 (0.24%) |
205 (0.12%) |
20 (0.01%) |
16 (0.01%) |
4 (0.00%) |
0 (0.00%) |
0 (0.00%) |
Margin | -45,418 (-26.31%) |
-45,626 (-26.43%) |
-45,811 (-26.53%) |
-45,815 (-26.54%) |
-45,827 (-26.54%) |
-45,831 (-26.54%) |
-45,831 (-26.54%) |
Predict Avg. | 1.52% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
Ballot Round 0 |
3,054 (1.73%) |
159 (0.09%) |
215 (0.12%) |
342 (0.19%) |
164 (0.09%) |
9 (0.01%) |
0 (0.00%) |
|
Cash On Hand |
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
$--
|
Website |
|
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
[Website]
|
Entry Date |
00/00/2019
|
--
|
--
|
00/00/2019
|
00/00/2019
|
00/00/2019
|
07/28/2017
|
|
Adj Poll Avg | 3.27%-- |
0.00%-- |
1.17%-- |
1.54%-- |
0.31%-- |
0.17%-- |
0.52%-- |
Emerson College 01/30/20-02/02/20 |
4.00% 1.0 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
1.00% 4.0 |
1.00% 1.0 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% 1.0 |
Data for Progress 01/28/20-02/02/20 |
4.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
2.00% -- |
2.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
David Binder Research 01/28/20-01/30/20 |
3.00% 1.0 |
0.00% -- |
1.00% -- |
3.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
1.00% -- |
American Research Group 01/27/20-01/30/20 |
3.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
2.00% -- |
2.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
Civiqs 01/26/20-01/29/20 |
2.00% 2.0 |
0.00% -- |
0.00% 1.0 |
2.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% 1.0 |
Park Street Strategies (PSS) 01/24/20-01/28/20 |
4.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
1.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
0.00% -- |
|
Endorsements | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DROPPED OUT - NO VOTES |
|
|
Cory Booker (D)
00, 2019 -
Jan 00, 2020
|
Julián Castro (D)
00, 2019 -
Jan 00, 2020
|
Marianne Williamson (D)
00, 2019 -
Jan 00, 2020
|
Kamala Harris (D)
00, 2019 -
Dec 03, 2019
|
Steve Bullock (D)
00, 2019 -
Dec 02, 2019
|
Joseph A. Sestak (D)
00, 2019 -
Dec 01, 2019
|
Wayne M. Messam (D)
00, 2019 -
Nov 20, 2019
|
Beto O'Rourke (D)
00, 2019 -
Nov 01, 2019
|
Tim Ryan (D)
00, 2019 -
Oct 24, 2019
|
Bill de Blasio (D)
00, 2019 -
Sep 20, 2019
|
Kirsten Gillibrand (D)
00, 2019 -
Aug 28, 2019
|
Seth Moulton (D)
00, 2019 -
Aug 23, 2019
|
Jay Inslee (D)
00, 2019 -
Aug 21, 2019
|
John Hickenlooper (D)
00, 2019 -
Aug 16, 2019
|
Mike Gravel (D)
00, 2019 -
Aug 06, 2019
|
Eric M. Swalwell (D)
00, 2019 -
Jul 08, 2019
|
Mitchell J. "Mitch" Landrieu (D)
Feb 06, 2019
|
Richard Ojeda II (D)
Nov 12, 2018 -
Jan 25, 2019
|
Stacey Abrams (D)
00, 2019
|
Sherrod Brown (D)
00, 2019
|
Eric Garcetti (D)
00, 2019
|
Eric Holder (D)
00, 2019
|
Terry McAuliffe (D)
00, 2019
|
Nancy Pelosi (D)
00, 2019
|
John F. Kerry (D)
Dec 07, 2018
|
Michael Avenatti (D)
Dec 04, 2018
|
|
Start Date |
End Date |
Type |
Title |
Contributor |
| VIDEO ADVERTISEMENTS |
|
|
|
Start Date |
Candidate |
Category |
Ad Tone |
Lng |
Title |
Run Time |
Contributor |
|
| BOOKS |
|
|
Title |
Purchase |
Contributor |
| INFORMATION LINKS |
|
|
DISCUSSION |
[View All 119 Previous Messages] |
|
I am a very progressive Democrat. But I am also very torn on 2020. Part of me wants a truly progressive nominee. The other part just wants someone who can defeat Trump. Part of me wants a younger, generational nominee like in 92 and 08, but then part of me just likes Uncle Joe Biden on a very personal level.
I am a very progressive Democrat. But I am also very torn on 2020. Part of me wants a truly progressive nominee. The other part just wants someone who can defeat Trump. Part of me wants a younger, generational nominee like in 92 and 08, but then part of me just likes Uncle Joe Biden on a very personal level.
|
|
|
D:7 | CA Pol Junkie ( 4947.9873 points)
|
Sun, December 16, 2018 09:43:36 PM UTC0:00
|
Part of me wants a younger, generational nominee like in 92 and 08, but then part of me just likes Uncle Joe Biden on a very personal level.
Nominating a septuagenarian seems like a bad idea no matter who it is. I'm very much in favor of younger more dynamic leadership like O'Rourke, Booker, or Harris.
Old Dominion Democrat: Part of me wants a younger, generational nominee like in 92 and 08, but then part of me just likes Uncle Joe Biden on a very personal level.
Nominating a septuagenarian seems like a bad idea no matter who it is. I'm very much in favor of younger more dynamic leadership like O'Rourke, Booker, or Harris.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Mon, December 17, 2018 06:44:33 PM UTC0:00
|
Younger does not automatically mean better. I mean take a look at the great Progressive/Populist candidates that have the best chances of beating Trump:
Sanders: 77
Warren: 69
Merkley: 62
Ojeda: 48
Yang: 43
Gabbard: 37
They have a wide age range as compared to the corporate Dems that are all 40 something except for Biden and Bloomberg
Younger does not automatically mean better. I mean take a look at the great Progressive/Populist candidates that have the best chances of beating Trump:
Sanders: 77
Warren: 69
Merkley: 62
Ojeda: 48
Yang: 43
Gabbard: 37
They have a wide age range as compared to the corporate Dems that are all 40 something except for Biden and Bloomberg
|
|
|
I:1038 | WA Indy ( 1790.9733 points)
|
Mon, December 17, 2018 07:00:26 PM UTC0:00
|
Ha! Ojeda. Hahaha!
Ha! Ojeda. Hahaha!
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Mon, December 17, 2018 07:47:20 PM UTC0:00
|
Yes Ojeda.
Yes Ojeda.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Mon, December 17, 2018 09:41:37 PM UTC0:00
|
how many candidates will be polled in the first Iowa poll to include Ojeda?
how many candidates will be polled in the first Iowa poll to include Ojeda?
|
|
|
D:7 | CA Pol Junkie ( 4947.9873 points)
x3
|
Mon, December 17, 2018 09:55:20 PM UTC0:00
|
Younger does not automatically mean better. I mean take a look at the great Progressive/Populist candidates that have the best chances of beating Trump:
Being most sincere and progressive is not what will give someone the best chance of beating Trump. Presidential elections are not won or lost based on policy. They are won or lost based on who people would rather see on their TV.
E Pluribus Unum: Younger does not automatically mean better. I mean take a look at the great Progressive/Populist candidates that have the best chances of beating Trump:
Being most sincere and progressive is not what will give someone the best chance of beating Trump. Presidential elections are not won or lost based on policy. They are won or lost based on who people would rather see on their TV.
|
|
|
Nominating a septuagenarian seems like a bad idea no matter who it is. I'm very much in favor of younger more dynamic leadership like O'Rourke, Booker, or Harris.
I get that and can appreciate that. But on the same spectrum, nominating from the O'Rourke/Gillum,/Abrams mold just to come up with only a moral victory Election Night isn't appealing either. (And I love those three candidates may I say).
CA Pol Junkie: <q 9602="">
Nominating a septuagenarian seems like a bad idea no matter who it is. I'm very much in favor of younger more dynamic leadership like O'Rourke, Booker, or Harris.
I get that and can appreciate that. But on the same spectrum, nominating from the O'Rourke/Gillum,/Abrams mold just to come up with only a moral victory Election Night isn't appealing either. (And I love those three candidates may I say).
|
|
|
The one quality all Democrats are looking for is the hardest to measure: the ability to beat Trump.
The one quality all Democrats are looking for is the hardest to measure: the ability to beat Trump.
|
|
|
D:6086 | Jason (11889.0225 points)
|
Tue, December 18, 2018 05:21:15 PM UTC0:00
|
My suspicion is that the Democratic nominee will fail to figure out how to beat Trump. The party is in an odd place in that it wants an ardent progressive as its standard-bearer, yet progressives suddenly love economic globalization now, which goes against everything that used to give them strength in the rust belt. It's easy to forecast a nominee who appeals to ethnic identity politics while embracing a corporate Democratic agenda.
If that's the case, Trump can exploit his usual snake-oil salesman approach again when it's easy to paint the Democratic nominee as aloof and out of touch with the common man's economic anxiety. The fact that Trump sold out the working class in yet another NAFTA death sentence won't matter since Democrats don't care enough to call him out on it--or worse, are in agreement with Trump.
My suspicion is that the Democratic nominee will fail to figure out how to beat Trump. The party is in an odd place in that it wants an ardent progressive as its standard-bearer, yet progressives suddenly love economic globalization now, which goes against everything that used to give them strength in the rust belt. It's easy to forecast a nominee who appeals to ethnic identity politics while embracing a corporate Democratic agenda.
If that's the case, Trump can exploit his usual snake-oil salesman approach again when it's easy to paint the Democratic nominee as aloof and out of touch with the common man's economic anxiety. The fact that Trump sold out the working class in yet another NAFTA death sentence won't matter since Democrats don't care enough to call him out on it--or worse, are in agreement with Trump.
|
|
|
"Globalization" is a misnomer. Nations have to work together in some way, while protecting their own interests. Trump has shown that telling the rest of the world to screw itself just screws ourselves.
"Globalization" is a misnomer. Nations have to work together in some way, while protecting their own interests. Trump has shown that telling the rest of the world to screw itself just screws ourselves.
|
|
|
I:6738 | IndyGeorgia ( 3906.0425 points)
|
Tue, January 29, 2019 06:40:44 PM UTC0:00
|
Delaney endorsed by Democratic Party chairs of Mills County, Wayne County, and Van Buren County. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/29/john-delaney-2020-iowa-1134060
Delaney endorsed by Democratic Party chairs of Mills County, Wayne County, and Van Buren County. [Link]
|
|
|
R:7114 | Kyle ( 752.3616 points)
|
Sun, March 24, 2019 07:53:17 PM UTC0:00
|
Not buying this poll and it is irrelevant at this stage in the game. But wow on Buttigieg's number.
Not buying this poll and it is irrelevant at this stage in the game. But wow on Buttigieg's number.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Sun, March 24, 2019 07:59:41 PM UTC0:00
|
Emerson has always sucked
Emerson has always sucked
|
|
|
I:9775 | Natalie ( 108.7084 points)
|
Sun, March 24, 2019 10:17:40 PM UTC0:00
|
Buttigieg has been getting himself out there a lot more lately. I'll admit, he's above Warren now on my list
Buttigieg has been getting himself out there a lot more lately. I'll admit, he's above Warren now on my list
|
|
|
R:7114 | Kyle ( 752.3616 points)
|
Thu, August 8, 2019 06:19:08 PM UTC0:00
|
Bernie only has a +25 favorable and is in the single digits in Iowa. He is done for.
Bernie only has a +25 favorable and is in the single digits in Iowa. He is done for.
|
|
|
D:7 | CA Pol Junkie ( 4947.9873 points)
x3
|
Thu, August 8, 2019 07:05:20 PM UTC0:00
|
Warren is running an excellent campaign and siphoning supporters from Sanders.
Warren is running an excellent campaign and siphoning supporters from Sanders.
|
|
|
I:9775 | Natalie ( 108.7084 points)
|
Sun, August 11, 2019 05:15:44 AM UTC0:00
|
I think Pete is going to win Iowa. Biden's momentum will fade and Pete will take his place in the next few months. It's going to come down to Pete vs. Warren.
I think Pete is going to win Iowa. Biden's momentum will fade and Pete will take his place in the next few months. It's going to come down to Pete vs. Warren.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Mon, August 12, 2019 06:49:45 PM UTC0:00
|
Strategically, is it a better strategy for a Sanders to go heavy for Iowa and hope for a plurality win or to focus more on New Hampshire so you can get at least one W out of IA/NH instead of risking a loss in both if Warren surges in NH as a result of her IA result
Strategically, is it a better strategy for a Sanders to go heavy for Iowa and hope for a plurality win or to focus more on New Hampshire so you can get at least one W out of IA/NH instead of risking a loss in both if Warren surges in NH as a result of her IA result
|
|
|
I:1038 | WA Indy ( 1790.9733 points)
|
Mon, August 12, 2019 07:10:03 PM UTC0:00
|
Well, if we’re talking expectations games, I’d expect him to do better in NH than Iowa. Though he essentially fought Clinton to a tie in 2016, he got 60% of the vote in NH. I don’t expect him to crush the field but he should, given that result, be able to eek out a plurality win even with Warren being from the same neighborhood. If he’s not top 3 in Iowa and winning NH, he’s got no chance.
Well, if we’re talking expectations games, I’d expect him to do better in NH than Iowa. Though he essentially fought Clinton to a tie in 2016, he got 60% of the vote in NH. I don’t expect him to crush the field but he should, given that result, be able to eek out a plurality win even with Warren being from the same neighborhood. If he’s not top 3 in Iowa and winning NH, he’s got no chance.
|
|
|
If Warren wins both Iowa and New Hampshire (which is what I expect will happen), then I'm pretty sure Kamala won't be able to stop her. It's not clear any of the other candidates matter, although there are still several months for lighting to possibly strike for Buttigeg, Gabbard, Yang (pretty much in that order of likelihood), or maybe even someone else.*
*definitely not Beto, however
If Warren wins both Iowa and New Hampshire (which is what I expect will happen), then I'm pretty sure Kamala won't be able to stop her. It's not clear any of the other candidates matter, although there are still several months for lighting to possibly strike for Buttigeg, Gabbard, Yang (pretty much in that order of likelihood), or maybe even someone else.*
*definitely not Beto, however
|
|
|
I:1038 | WA Indy ( 1790.9733 points)
|
Tue, August 13, 2019 04:43:58 AM UTC0:00
|
I'm gonna skip over the last part, and say that anyone who wins Iowa AND New Hampshire wins the whole ball game.
I'm gonna skip over the last part, and say that anyone who wins Iowa AND New Hampshire wins the whole ball game.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5212.2285 points)
|
Tue, August 13, 2019 09:26:53 PM UTC0:00
|
although Sanders in 2016 was very close to sweeping IA/NH and I think the IA result didn't really change things one way of another for the Super Tuesday states. So you'd need to win at least one of IA or NH by a narrow margin to sweep them and not lock it up.
Something like how Santorum won Iowa, but people didn't notice it because it was called way after people were paying attention.
although Sanders in 2016 was very close to sweeping IA/NH and I think the IA result didn't really change things one way of another for the Super Tuesday states. So you'd need to win at least one of IA or NH by a narrow margin to sweep them and not lock it up.
Something like how Santorum won Iowa, but people didn't notice it because it was called way after people were paying attention.
|
|
|
D:10313 | The Hunt-isto ( 73.6527 points)
x2
|
Tue, August 27, 2019 04:04:57 PM UTC0:00
|
Is there any hope for Harris ?
Is there any hope for Harris ?
|
|
|
I:9775 | Natalie ( 108.7084 points)
|
Wed, August 28, 2019 06:26:51 PM UTC0:00
|
Is there any hope for Harris ?
Why do you feel the need to ask such stupid questions? Of course there is. Anything could happen between today and Iowa.
Ladies and gentlemen, we've got a 200 IQ political analyst over here. What a genius.
The Hunt-isto: Is there any hope for Harris ?
Why do you feel the need to ask such stupid questions? Of course there is. Anything could happen between today and Iowa.
Ladies and gentlemen, we've got a 200 IQ political analyst over here. What a genius.
|
|
|
[View Next Page] |
|
|