Home About Chat Users Issues Party Candidates Polling Firms Media News Polls Calendar Key Races United States President Senate House Governors International

New User Account
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource." 
Email: Password:

  SD Constitutional Amendment E - Make judges legally and financially liable for their decisions retroactively
RACE DETAILS
Parents > United States > South Dakota > Ballot Initiatives/Referendums > 2006 Referendums > Make judges legally & financially liable for their decisions retroactively?
OfficeReferendum
HonorificReferendum - Abbr:
Type Referendum
Filing Deadline September 01, 2006 - 12:00am Central
Polls Open November 07, 2006 - 06:00am Central
Polls Close November 07, 2006 - 08:00pm Central
Term Start January 03, 2007 - 12:00pm
Term End January 03, 3000 - 12:00pm
Turnout 65.13% Registered 43.77% Total Population
ContributorRP
Last ModifiedScott³ May 25, 2008 03:07pm
Data SourcesSOS [Link]
Description Citizens serving on juries, school boards, city councils, county commissions, or in similar capacities, and prosecutors and judges, are all required to make judicial decisions. Their decisions may be reversed on appeal, or they may be removed from office for misconduct or by election. However, they cannot be made to pay money damages for making such decisions. This allows them to do their job without fear of threat or reprisal from either side.

The proposed amendment to the State Constitution would allow thirteen special grand jurors to expose these decision makers to fines and jail, and strip them of public insurance coverage and up to one-half of their retirement benefits, for making decisions which break rules defined by the special grand jurors. Special grand jurors are drawn from those who submit their names and registered voters.

The proposed amendment is retroactive. The special grand jurors may penalize any decision-maker still alive for decisions made many years ago.

If approved, the proposed amendment will likely be challenged in court and may be declared to be in violation of the US Constitution. If so, the State may be required to pay attorneys fees and costs.

A vote “Yes” will change the Constitution.

A vote “No” will leave the Constitution as it is.
PRIMARY/OTHER SCHEDULE

CANDIDATES
Photo  
Name No Yes  
PartyNO YES  
Campaign Logo  
Certified Votes 294,734 (89.21%) 35,641 (10.79%)  
Margin0 (0.00%) -259,093 (-78.42%)  
Predict Avg.0.00% 0.00%  
Cash On Hand $-- $--  
Website  
Entry Date -- --  
Bar
MATCHUP POLLS (0 from 0 pollsters)
ENDORSEMENTS
Endorsements
 


EVENTS
Start Date End Date Type Title Contributor

VIDEO ADVERTISEMENTS
Start Date Candidate Category Ad Tone Lng Title Run Time Contributor

BOOKS
Title Purchase Contributor

INFORMATION LINKS

NEWS
Date Category Headline Article Contributor

DISCUSSION