Home About Chat Users Issues Party Candidates Polling Firms Media News Polls Calendar Key Races United States President Senate House Governors International

New User Account
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource." 
Email: Password:

  In Supreme Court dissent, Thomas cites Thomas in arguing to overturn decision authored by Thomas
NEWS DETAILS
Parent(s) Candidate 
ContributorRP 
Last EditedRP  Feb 24, 2020 09:44pm
Logged 0
CategoryLegal Ruling
AuthorTyler Olson
News DateMonday, February 24, 2020 06:00:00 PM UTC0:0
DescriptionEven by Supreme Court standards, this development takes a minute to wrap your head around.

In a dissent to the high court's decision Monday not to hear a tax case, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas managed to cite an opinion that he wrote while making the case for why the tribunal should overturn a precedent he authored.

"Although I authored Brand X, 'it is never too late to ‘surrende[r] former views to a better considered position,'" Thomas wrote in his Monday dissent, quoting himself from a 2018 opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.

Thomas has recently been quite vocal in advocating for the court to overturn a variety of precedents, saying in one opinion last year that when "faced with a demonstrably erroneous precedent, my rule is simple: We should not follow it."
Share
ArticleRead Full Article

NEWS
Date Category Headline Article Contributor

DISCUSSION