|
|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
Iowa View: 1 man, 1 woman isn't the Bible's only marriage view
|
|---|
| Parent(s) |
Issue
|
| Contributor | Homegrown Democrat |
| Last Edited | Homegrown Democrat Jun 07, 2013 08:52pm |
| Logged |
0
|
| Category | Commentary |
| Author | HECTOR AVALOS, ROBERT R. CARGILL AND KENNETH ATKINSON. |
| Media | Newspaper - Des Moines Register |
| News Date | Monday, June 3, 2013 02:00:00 AM UTC0:0 |
| Description | The debate about marriage equality often centers, however discretely, on an appeal to the Bible. Unfortunately, such appeals often reflect a lack of biblical literacy on the part of those who use that complex collection of texts as an authority to enact modern social policy.
As academic biblical scholars, we wish to clarify that the biblical texts do not support the frequent claim that marriage between one man and one woman is the only type of marriage deemed acceptable by the Bible’s authors.
The fact that marriage is not defined as only that between one man and one woman is reflected in the entry on “marriage” in the authoritative Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): “Marriage is one expression of kinship family patterns in which typically a man and at least one woman cohabitate publicly and permanently as a basic social unit” (p. 861). |
| Share |
|
|
2¢
|
|
| Article | Read Full Article |
|
| Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|
