|
|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
Rick Scott’s Drug Law Isn’t Saving Florida Much Money
|
|---|
| Parent(s) |
Container
|
| Contributor | RP |
| Last Edited | RP Aug 26, 2011 12:53pm |
| Logged |
0
|
| Category | Analysis |
| Author | Travis Waldron |
| News Date | Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:00:00 PM UTC0:0 |
| Description | When Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) signed the law requiring welfare recipients to pass annual drug tests to collect benefits, he justified the likely unconstitutional law by saying it would save the state money by keeping drug users from using public money to subsidize their drug habits. Drug use, Scott claimed, was higher among welfare recipients than among the rest of the population.
Preliminary results from the state’s first round of testing, however, has seemingly proven both of those claims false. Only 2 percent of welfare recipients failed drug tests, meaning the state must reimburse the cost of the $30 drug tests to the 96 percent of recipients who passed drug tests (two percent did not take the tests). After reimbursements, the state’s savings will be almost negligible, the Tampa Tribune reports
Meanwhile, the state’s already-small annual savings could be wiped out entirely by the cost of implementing the program and issuing the reimbursements. And as Derek Newton, the spokesman for the Florida chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, told the Tribune, the cost of the program could skyrocket if the state has to defend it in court. |
| Share |
|
|
2¢
|
|
| Article | Read Full Article |
|
|
