Home About Chat Users Issues Party Candidates Polling Firms Media News Polls Calendar Key Races United States President Senate House Governors International

New User Account
"A historical political resource." 
Email: Password:

  Leno bill would limit PG&E political spending
Parent(s) Candidate 
Last EditedCraverguy  Jun 17, 2010 12:50am
Logged 4 [Older]
CategoryProposed Legislation
AuthorTim Redmond
News DateMonday, June 14, 2010 07:15:00 PM UTC0:0
DescriptionState Senator Mark Leno is introducing a bill that could stop Pacific Gas and Electric Company from spending ratepayer money on political campaigns.

The bill, which doesn't yet have a number, would put a serious crimp in the private utility's ability to launch another effort like Prop. 16 -- the $50 million campaign to block public power in California.

The bill wouldn't stop PG&E from spending money on politics -- that might fly in the face of the Supreme Court's rulings on corporations and campaign finance. It just says that no ratepayer money can be spent -- and since PG&E gets the vast majority of its money from ratepayers, the measure would at the very least significantly limit the company's political efforts.

And since PG&E is a regulated utility, the state of California has every right to control how much money PG&E collects from its customers -- and where that money goes.

Not only would the bill ban PG&E from running its own Prop. 16-style statewide campaign, it could block the company from spending tens of millions of dollars to oppose public-power efforts. The bill states that any gas and electric utility with more than three million customers in California (and there's only one such company) "shall not spend funds received from ratepayers as authorized revenues on political and public affairs related to state or local governments. For purposes of this section, political and public affairs spending includes any activities involving, directly or indirectly, advocacy of the election or defeat of political candidates and of the adoption or defeat of ballot measures, through the actions of the corporation or through a third party."

A few years ago, a bill like this would have had little chance in the state Legislature, where PG&E spent lavishly and was relatively popular. But under CEO Peter Darbee, the company has done nothing but piss off legislators. Not one state lawmaker endorsed Prop. 16.
ArticleRead Full Article

Date Category Headline Article Contributor