|
|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
Jobs paradox?
|
|---|
| Parent(s) |
Issue
|
| Contributor | Bob Sacamano |
| Last Edited | Bob Sacamano Aug 07, 2009 05:22pm |
| Logged |
0
|
| Category | Blog Entry |
| Author | Paul Krugman |
| News Date | Friday, August 7, 2009 03:00:00 PM UTC0:0 |
| Description | Some readers have asked how it’s possible for unemployment to fall when the economy is still losing jobs, albeit at a slower rate. The answer is a bit annoying.
First, the jobs number and the unemployment number are based on different surveys — a survey of establishments in the first case, a survey of households in the second. Sometimes employment rises by one measure while falling by the other, although it happens that this month there isn’t much difference in the jobs number. (The establishment survey is considered a more reliable measure of month-to-month job changes.)
Second, how do we measure unemployment? Contrary to what some correspondents think, it doesn’t have anything to do with receipt of unemployment insurance. It comes, instead, from a survey in which people are asked whether they’re working and, if not, whether they’re looking for work. And what this month’s data show is a relatively large rise in the number of people “not in labor force” — neither working nor looking for work. That’s how the unemployment rate can fall even with fewer people working. |
| Share |
|
|
2¢
|
|
| Article | Read Full Article |
|
| Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|
