|
|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
Knowing when to walk away
|
|---|
| Parent(s) |
Issue
|
| Contributor | Craverguy |
| Last Edited | Craverguy Nov 14, 2008 01:53pm |
| Logged |
0
|
| Category | Commentary |
| Media | Newspaper - Denver Post |
| News Date | Friday, November 14, 2008 02:30:00 AM UTC0:0 |
| Description | It wouldn't be the George W. Bush we all know if our shamed president didn't spend his remaining White House days in a final fit of polarization.
That's what Bush's moves this week are clearly about: dividing, not uniting. The New York Times reported that during his first meeting with Barack Obama, the outgoing president suggested he might support Democrats' economic stimulus package and aid to struggling automakers if party leaders "drop their opposition to a free-trade agreement with Colombia." While Bush later denied an overt quid pro quo, one was obviously implied.
Strange behavior? Yes and no. Bush is the Texas Hold 'Em addict who raised on the largest tax cuts in contemporary history, re-raised on two wars and went all-in with an attempt to privatize Social Security. So, yes, from a brinkmanship standpoint, it seems bizarre that in exchange for a massive legislative effort to right the entire economy, the cowboy president may insist on a tiny trade deal that at best promises a boost of "less than seven-hundredths of one percent to U.S. gross domestic product," according to the Brookings Institution.
But, then, Bush is the protege of Karl Rove and the son of George H.W. Bush. So, no, his Colombia demand isn't weird at all — nor is it as small a wager as it appears. |
| Share |
|
|
2¢
|
|
| Article | Read Full Article |
|
| Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|
