|
|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
Is History Siding With Obama’s Economic Plan?
|
|---|
| Parent(s) |
Candidate
|
| Contributor | DFWDem |
| Last Edited | DFWDem Sep 02, 2008 09:41am |
| Logged |
0
|
| Category | General |
| Media | Newspaper - New York Times |
| News Date | Saturday, August 30, 2008 03:00:00 PM UTC0:0 |
| Description | CLEARLY, there are major differences between the economic policies of Senators Barack Obama and John McCain. Mr. McCain wants more tax cuts for the rich; Mr. Obama wants tax cuts for the poor and middle class. The two men also disagree on health care, energy and many other topics.
Such differences are hardly surprising. Democrats and Republicans have followed different approaches to the economy for as long as there have been Democrats and Republicans. Longer, actually. Remember Hamilton versus Jefferson?
Many Americans know that there are characteristic policy differences between the two parties. But few are aware of two important facts about the post-World War II era, both of which are brilliantly delineated in a new book, “Unequal Democracy,” by Larry M. Bartels, a professor of political science at Princeton. Understanding them might help voters see what could be at stake, economically speaking, in November.
I call the first fact the Great Partisan Growth Divide. Simply put, the United States economy has grown faster, on average, under Democratic presidents than under Republicans. |
| Share |
|
|
2¢
|
|
| Article | Read Full Article |
|
| Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|
