Home About Chat Users Issues Party Candidates Polling Firms Media News Polls Calendar Key Races United States President Senate House Governors International

New User Account
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource." 
Email: Password:

  New Orleans jury rules against Merck [in Vioxx case]
NEWS DETAILS
Parent(s) Issue 
ContributorBrandonius Maximus 
Last EditedBrandonius Maximus  Aug 17, 2006 10:56am
Logged 1 [Older]
CategoryLegal Ruling
MediaWebsite - Yahoo News
News DateThursday, August 17, 2006 04:00:00 PM UTC0:0
DescriptionNEW ORLEANS - Merck failed to warn doctors about the risks of its painkiller Vioxx and must pay a retired FBI agent $50 million to compensate for the heart attack he suffered after taking the drug, a federal jury found Thursday.

The jury also found that Merck & Co. "knowingly misrepresented or failed to disclose" information about the drug to retired FBI agent Gerald Barnett's doctors.

The same jury was to deliberate later in the day on possible punitive damages for Barnett.

On its verdict sheet, the jury had the chance to assign percentages of fault to Merck and various physicians, but assigned blame only to Merck.
Share
ArticleRead Full Article

NEWS
Date Category Headline Article Contributor

DISCUSSION