 | MAPS |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 1979 -
KERSHAW gained from LANCASTER.
(S.C. Acts 1979, no. 273, secs. 1, 6/pp. 968-970)
|
|
|
December 31, 1977 -
December 31, 1979
KERSHAW lost to LANCASTER.
(S.C. Acts 1977, no. 348, secs. 1, 5/pp. 982-984)
|
|
|
March 05, 1925 -
December 31, 1977
KERSHAW gained small area from LEE.
(S.C. Acts 1925, no. 14, sec. 1/pp. 12-13)
|
|
|
March 07, 1921 -
March 05, 1925
KERSHAW lost small area to LEE.
(S.C. Acts 1921, no. 170, sec. 1/pp. 239-240)
|
|
|
February 25, 1902 -
March 07, 1921
KERSHAW lost to re-creation of LEE.
(S.C. Acts 1902, no. 651, sec. 1/pp. 1194-1196)
|
|
|
March 01, 1899 -
February 25, 1902
KERSHAW regained area lost to creation of LEE in 1898 when state supreme court ruled creation of LEE unconstitutional.
(S.C. Acts 1899, no. 122, sec. 1/p. 191)
|
|
|
February 19, 1898 -
March 01, 1899
KERSHAW lost to creation of LEE.
(S.C. Acts 1898, no. 575, sec. 1/p. 908)
|
|
|
December 21, 1792 -
February 19, 1898
KERSHAW exchanged with CLAREMONT (extinct), lost to LANCASTER and RICHLAND.
(S.C. Acts 1792, p. 27)
|
|
|
February 19, 1791 -
December 21, 1792
KERSHAW created from CLAREMONT (extinct), FAIRFIELD, LANCASTER, and RICHLAND.
(S.C. Acts 1791, Jan. sess., p. 45)
|
|
