Home About Chat Users Issues Party Candidates Polling Firms Media News Polls Calendar Key Races United States President Senate House Governors International

New User Account
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource." 
Email: Password:

  Tulare - History
County DETAILS
Parents > United States > California > CA Counties > Tulare  
Websitehttps://tularecounty.ca.gov/county/
Established April 20, 1852
Disbanded Still Active
Last ModifiedRP February 17, 2020 05:35pm
Description

MAPS

May 23, 1893 -


TULARE lost to creation of KINGS. Act passed 22 March 1893; referendum for or against creation of new county held 23 May 1893. See 1986_pt.shp and 1991_pt.shp for the location of small, non-mappable changes. Calif. Stats. 1893, 30th sess., ch. 150/pp. 176-181; Kings County History, http://calflytech.com/kingshistory.html, 18 July 2002

March 23, 1876 - May 23, 1893


TULARE exchanged with FRESNO Calif. Stats. 1875, 21st sess., ch. 301/p. 397

March 27, 1874 - March 23, 1876


TULARE exchanged with FRESNO Calif. Stats. 1873, 20th sess., ch. 468/p. 700

January 01, 1873 - March 27, 1874


TULARE gained from KERN Political Code 1872, 1: secs. 3940-3941/pp. 138-139

January 22, 1870 - January 01, 1873


TULARE lost to MONO the remnant of territory that was separated from TULARE by the creation of INYO on 22 March 1866. Calif. Stats. 1869, 18th sess., ch. 18/p. 20

February 10, 1868 - January 22, 1870


TULARE lost to KERN Calif. Stats. 1867, 17th sess., ch. 43/p. 40

April 02, 1866 - February 10, 1868


TULARE lost to creation of KERN Calif. Stats. 1865, 16th sess., ch. 569/pp. 796-798

March 22, 1866 - April 02, 1866


TULARE lost to creation of INYO; INYO boundaries were identical to those of COSO (proposed) [see 4 April 1864] Calif. Stats. 1865, 16th sess., ch. 316/pp. 355-358

April 19, 1856 - March 22, 1866


TULARE lost to creation of FREZNO (now FRESNO), gained from MERCED. Calif. Stats. 1856, 7th sess., ch. 127/p. 183

April 20, 1852 - April 19, 1856


TULARE created from MARIPOSA Calif. Stats. 1852, 3d sess., ch. 153/pp. 240-242

DISCUSSION
[Download as CSV]