|
Affiliation | Democratic |
|
<- |
2017-08-01 |
|
|
Name | Joe Manchin |
Address | Fairmont, West Virginia , United States |
Email | None |
Website | [Link] |
Donate | |
Born |
August 24, 1947
(76 years)
|
Contributor | ... |
Last Modifed | RBH Feb 01, 2022 08:10pm |
Tags |
Caucasian - Italian - Married - NRA - Catholic - Straight -
|
Info | Joseph "Joe" Manchin III
Since becoming governor in 2005, Joe Manchin's administration has made great accomplishments - from cutting taxes to creating good jobs and getting our financial house in order. While other states have been hit hard by this global economic downturn, West Virginia has maintained a strong, responsible government, and Joe Manchin will work even harder to bring responsible government initiatives to Washington.
He is known throughout West Virginia and our nation as a person who will listen to all sides. He is an independent voice who can work across party lines to achieve solutions to today's challenges.
Joe Manchin's hometown is Farmington, W.Va., a small coal mining community. He attended West Virginia University on a football scholarship, married his wife, Gayle, and became a successful businessman. Joe Manchin got his start in public service as a state legislator from 1982 to 1996. He served as West Virginia's Secretary of State from 2000 to 2004. His administration was known for its outstanding customer service.
As governor, Joe Manchin values all of our people's input. This team builder mentality has help Joe Manchin to become a leader on the national scene as well, now serving as Chair of the National Governors Association and Chairman of the Southern States Energy Board. He is also the past president of the Council of State Governments, a past chairman of the Democratic Governors Association and the Southern Governors' Association.
Gov. Manchin is an avid pilot, outdoorsman, hunter, angler and motorcyclist. He has been married for 42 years to the former Gayle Conelly of Beckley. They have three children and seven grandchildren.
[Link] |
| BOOKS |
|
|
Title |
Purchase |
Contributor |
|
Start Date |
End Date |
Type |
Title |
Contributor |
DISCUSSION |
[View All 97 Previous Messages] |
|
I love this part of the argument where the dumbass gives up. It gives me such a jolly
The irony is overwhelming for everyone but you :)
E Pluribus Unum: I love this part of the argument where the dumbass gives up. It gives me such a jolly
The irony is overwhelming for everyone but you :)
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 06:20:58 PM UTC0:00
|
I have literally been explaining a bill, you are going off on"U CAN CONVONCE FNJNSKSJNASNAJSKJASN"
You are literally jumping off the deep end cuz u don't want to admit you are defending people dying lol
I have literally been explaining a bill, you are going off on"U CAN CONVONCE FNJNSKSJNASNAJSKJASN"
You are literally jumping off the deep end cuz u don't want to admit you are defending people dying lol
|
|
|
Thumbs it down all you want. You obviously have missed what I was saying.
Thanks for changing your reaction :)
Southern_Moderate2: Thumbs it down all you want. You obviously have missed what I was saying.
Thanks for changing your reaction :)
|
|
|
I have literally been explaining a bill, you are going off on"U CAN CONVONCE FNJNSKSJNASNAJSKJASN"
You are literally jumping off the deep end cuz u don't want to admit you are defending people dying lol
Oh boy
E Pluribus Unum: I have literally been explaining a bill, you are going off on"U CAN CONVONCE FNJNSKSJNASNAJSKJASN"
You are literally jumping off the deep end cuz u don't want to admit you are defending people dying lol
Oh boy
|
|
|
D:6454 | Mr. Matt ( 1761.4666 points)
x3
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 06:24:32 PM UTC0:00
|
image://i.pinimg.com/originals/40/ac/62/40ac6269b7e8c84f2a9ab4ec29e5bc4a.png
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 06:24:36 PM UTC0:00
|
Thumbs it down all you want. You obviously have missed what I was saying.
If you had a point, you would have SAID IT
Southern_Moderate2: Thumbs it down all you want. You obviously have missed what I was saying.
If you had a point, you would have SAID IT
|
|
|
Thumbs it down all you want. You obviously have missed what I was saying.
If you had a point, you would have SAID IT
I would rather not, but I suppose you have forced my hand.
My point is that putting aside whether I agree with your views or not, you do such an abysmal job at presenting them, you could not convince anyone of anything.
No doubt this will provoke a testy reaction from you with lots of capital letters (except now it won't since I've said that), but given that you have basically taken on the role of Donald Trump's twitter account on this website, I can live with that. You just spew nonsense and half of us react and the other half roll their eyes.
In other news, we have unfortunately turned poor Joe Manchin's page into a lengthy argument irrelevant to him.
E Pluribus Unum: <q 10538="">Thumbs it down all you want. You obviously have missed what I was saying.
If you had a point, you would have SAID IT
I would rather not, but I suppose you have forced my hand.
My point is that putting aside whether I agree with your views or not, you do such an abysmal job at presenting them, you could not convince anyone of anything.
No doubt this will provoke a testy reaction from you with lots of capital letters (except now it won't since I've said that), but given that you have basically taken on the role of Donald Trump's twitter account on this website, I can live with that. You just spew nonsense and half of us react and the other half roll their eyes.
In other news, we have unfortunately turned poor Joe Manchin's page into a lengthy argument irrelevant to him.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 06:38:48 PM UTC0:00
|
I would rather not, but I suppose you have forced my hand.
My point is that putting aside whether I agree with your views or not, you do such an abysmal job at presenting them, you could not convince anyone of anything.
No doubt this will provoke a testy reaction from you with lots of capital letters (except now it won't since I've said that), but given that you have basically taken on the role of Donald Trump's twitter account on this website, I can live with that. You just spew nonsense and half of us react and the other half roll their eyes.
In other news, we have unfortunately turned poor Joe Manchin's page into a lengthy argument irrelevant to him.
Literally all I did is state the bill and when presented with the notion "Progressives gotta concede" I point out THEY DID and that Manchin essentially wants to turn the bill into an ineffective mess when a broader bill that people want passed will help Dems down the line. I'm literally the only one staying on topic talking about the BILL ur the ones that jump randomly to "BErnie caucus with gop" nonsense. You are projecting so fucking hard.
Southern_Moderate2:
I would rather not, but I suppose you have forced my hand.
My point is that putting aside whether I agree with your views or not, you do such an abysmal job at presenting them, you could not convince anyone of anything.
No doubt this will provoke a testy reaction from you with lots of capital letters (except now it won't since I've said that), but given that you have basically taken on the role of Donald Trump's twitter account on this website, I can live with that. You just spew nonsense and half of us react and the other half roll their eyes.
In other news, we have unfortunately turned poor Joe Manchin's page into a lengthy argument irrelevant to him.
Literally all I did is state the bill and when presented with the notion "Progressives gotta concede" I point out THEY DID and that Manchin essentially wants to turn the bill into an ineffective mess when a broader bill that people want passed will help Dems down the line. I'm literally the only one staying on topic talking about the BILL ur the ones that jump randomly to "BErnie caucus with gop" nonsense. You are projecting so ****ing hard.
|
|
|
Again, I think you missed what I was saying.
Please let us all know when your two brain cells wake up :)
I know you like to have the last word, so have at it. This is mine.
Again, I think you missed what I was saying.
Please let us all know when your two brain cells wake up :)
I know you like to have the last word, so have at it. This is mine.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 06:46:39 PM UTC0:00
|
Again, I think you missed what I was saying.
Please let us all know when your two brain cells wake up :)
I know you like to have the last word, so have at it. This is mine.
Literally how can you actually sit there with ur stupid smug face while people are struggling while you argue against helping them to defend some rich asshole and own someone. That's actually disgusting
Southern_Moderate2: Again, I think you missed what I was saying.
Please let us all know when your two brain cells wake up :)
I know you like to have the last word, so have at it. This is mine.
Literally how can you actually sit there with ur stupid smug face while people are struggling while you argue against helping them to defend some rich ******* and own someone. That's actually disgusting
|
|
|
BEER:10271 | WSNJ ( 446.1584 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 08:57:57 PM UTC0:00
|
Dude not everyone who disagrees with you is some high society Scrooge McDuck billionaire.
Dude not everyone who disagrees with you is some high society Scrooge McDuck billionaire.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 09:25:04 PM UTC0:00
|
Dude not everyone who disagrees with you is some high society Scrooge McDuck billionaire.
Joe Manchins net worth is estimated to be in between $4,376,067 and $12,845,005 did you seriously try to argue he was not rich?
WSNJ: Dude not everyone who disagrees with you is some high society Scrooge McDuck billionaire.
Joe Manchins net worth is estimated to be in between $4,376,067 and $12,845,005 did you seriously try to argue he was not rich?
|
|
|
I:1038 | WA Indy ( 1790.9733 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 09:31:03 PM UTC0:00
|
He was talking about other users.
He was talking about other users.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 09:38:52 PM UTC0:00
|
Well that would be a weird argument to say when I literally never said that at all.
Well that would be a weird argument to say when I literally never said that at all.
|
|
|
It's easy to assume that's your intent, the same way you make assumptions about other folks' arguments.
People disagree with you. Discussions aren't going to typically change minds but are occasionally fun to do. And then there's talking with you.
It's easy to assume that's your intent, the same way you make assumptions about other folks' arguments.
People disagree with you. Discussions aren't going to typically change minds but are occasionally fun to do. And then there's talking with you.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 09:53:45 PM UTC0:00
|
When u assume al it does is make an ass outta u.
I'm just going by what ur all saying, "Build Back Better Plan bad, Manchin right, let the poors die".
If that's not ur argument, why are you here?
When u assume al it does is make an ass outta u.
I'm just going by what ur all saying, "Build Back Better Plan bad, Manchin right, let the poors die".
If that's not ur argument, why are you here?
|
|
|
BEER:10271 | WSNJ ( 446.1584 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 10:09:33 PM UTC0:00
|
When u assume al it does is make an ass outta u.
I'm just going by what ur all saying, "Build Back Better Plan bad, Manchin right, let the poors die".
If that's not ur argument, why are you here?
“Let poors die” sorry I forgot I grew up in a household with only one person employed and neither of those people having a collage education. Also I don’t know the income of my liberal friends on this site but I doubt they are Joe Manchin rich, and I also doubt they want the Build Back Better Plan blocked. Maybe JUST MAYBE they disagree with you on some things in the bill and that’s okay, just because they have a certain world view does not mean they endorse the most extreme and out of this world effects of not passing the bill you have conjured
E Pluribus Unum: When u assume al it does is make an ass outta u.
I'm just going by what ur all saying, "Build Back Better Plan bad, Manchin right, let the poors die".
If that's not ur argument, why are you here?
“Let poors die” sorry I forgot I grew up in a household with only one person employed and neither of those people having a collage education. Also I don’t know the income of my liberal friends on this site but I doubt they are Joe Manchin rich, and I also doubt they want the Build Back Better Plan blocked. Maybe JUST MAYBE they disagree with you on some things in the bill and that’s okay, just because they have a certain world view does not mean they endorse the most extreme and out of this world effects of not passing the bill you have conjured
|
|
|
“Let poors die” sorry I forgot I grew up in a household with only one person employed and neither of those people having a collage education. Also I don’t know the income of my liberal friends on this site but I doubt they are Joe Manchin rich, and I also doubt they want the Build Back Better Plan blocked. Maybe JUST MAYBE they disagree with you on some things in the bill and that’s okay, just because they have a certain world view does not mean they endorse the most extreme and out of this world effects of not passing the bill you have conjured
You care about the poors so much ur a Republican, the party known for helping the disadvantaged (Circa 1910-24)
My point is disagreements on the bill at this point is doing the bad thing. The bil has already been watered down, anything less than this would be the equivalent of running someone over then giving them a Spongebob Band-aid.
WSNJ: “Let poors die” sorry I forgot I grew up in a household with only one person employed and neither of those people having a collage education. Also I don’t know the income of my liberal friends on this site but I doubt they are Joe Manchin rich, and I also doubt they want the Build Back Better Plan blocked. Maybe JUST MAYBE they disagree with you on some things in the bill and that’s okay, just because they have a certain world view does not mean they endorse the most extreme and out of this world effects of not passing the bill you have conjured
You care about the poors so much ur a Republican, the party known for helping the disadvantaged (Circa 1910-24)
My point is disagreements on the bill at this point is doing the bad thing. The bil has already been watered down, anything less than this would be the equivalent of running someone over then giving them a Spongebob Band-aid.
|
|
|
BEER:10271 | WSNJ ( 446.1584 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 10:48:55 PM UTC0:00
|
I live in a state with a big bloated government with a lot of power that progressives drool over, the highest taxes in the nation to fund this big bloated government, and in somewhat ironic fashion only the rich and well connected can get ahead.
I live in a state with a big bloated government with a lot of power that progressives drool over, the highest taxes in the nation to fund this big bloated government, and in somewhat ironic fashion only the rich and well connected can get ahead.
|
|
|
BEER:10271 | WSNJ ( 446.1584 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 10:49:59 PM UTC0:00
|
Also don’t you dare assume my motives.
Also don’t you dare assume my motives.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Thu, October 21, 2021 11:24:22 PM UTC0:00
|
Fundamental misunderstanding of progressives claiming they want "Big Bloated government" and "power". Progressives hate NJ too cuz of the establishment hold they have there
Fundamental misunderstanding of progressives claiming they want "Big Bloated government" and "power". Progressives hate NJ too cuz of the establishment hold they have there
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5506.7227 points)
x2
|
Fri, October 22, 2021 05:08:08 AM UTC0:00
|
Sometimes it's just best to let it go...
Sometimes it's just best to let it go...
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Fri, October 22, 2021 05:33:19 AM UTC0:00
|
https://youtu.be/eCPjQNwdS9A
[Link]
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -193.5252 points)
|
Mon, October 25, 2021 11:08:59 PM UTC0:00
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1450504905056161792
[Link]
|
|
|
He's smart enough to know that would never fly
He's smart enough to know that would never fly
|
|
|
[View Next Page] |
|
| INFORMATION LINKS |
|
|
ENDORSEMENTS |
Eleventh Circuit Court Judge - May 18, 2023 |
NPA |
Reject |
IRS Commissioner - Mar 09, 2023 |
NPA |
Reject |
AK US Senate - Open Primary - Aug 16, 2022 |
R |
Lisa Murkowski |
WV District 02 - R Primary - May 10, 2022 |
R |
David B. McKinley |
US Secretary of the Interior - Mar 15, 2021 |
D |
Debra Haaland |
WV US President - Nov 03, 2020 |
D |
Joe Biden |
Supreme Court - Associate Justice - Oct 26, 2020 |
NPA |
Reject |
MA US Senate - D Primary - Sep 01, 2020 |
D |
Edward J. Markey |
ME US Senate - R Primary - Jul 14, 2020 |
R |
Susan Collins |
WV US President - D Primary - Jun 09, 2020 |
D |
Joe Biden |
US Secretary of Energy - Dec 02, 2019 |
R |
Dan Brouillette |
Third Circuit Court Judge - Jul 16, 2019 |
R |
Peter J. Phipps |
Second Circuit Court Judge - May 08, 2019 |
R |
Joseph F. Bianco |
US Secretary of the Interior - Apr 11, 2019 |
R |
David Bernhardt |
US Attorney General - Feb 14, 2019 |
R |
William P. Barr |
Supreme Court - Associate Justice - Oct 06, 2018 |
R |
Brett M. Kavanaugh |
Eleventh Circuit Court Judge - Jul 31, 2018 |
R |
Britt C. Grant |
US Ambassador to Luxembourg - May 24, 2018 |
NPA |
Reject |
C.I.A. Director - May 17, 2018 |
I |
Gina Haspel |
US Secretary of State - Apr 26, 2018 |
R |
Mike Pompeo |
US Ambassador to Germany - Apr 26, 2018 |
R |
Richard Grenell |
US Secretary of Health & Human Services - Jan 24, 2018 |
R |
Alex M. Azar II |
Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board - Jan 23, 2018 |
R |
Jerome H. "Jay" Powell |
US Secretary of Homeland Security - Dec 05, 2017 |
R |
Kirstjen Nielsen |
D.C. Circuit Court Judge - Nov 28, 2017 |
R |
Gregory G. Katsas |
Seventh Circuit Court Judge - Oct 31, 2017 |
R |
Amy Coney Barrett |
US Ambassador to the Holy See - Oct 16, 2017 |
R |
Callista Gingrich |
US Deputy Secretary of the Interior - Jul 24, 2017 |
R |
David Bernhardt |
Supreme Court - Associate Justice - Apr 07, 2017 |
R |
Neil M. Gorsuch |
US Ambassador to Israel - Mar 23, 2017 |
R |
David M. Friedman |
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator - Mar 13, 2017 |
R |
Seema Verma |
US Secretary of Energy - Mar 02, 2017 |
R |
Rick Perry |
US Secretary of Housing & Urban Development - Mar 02, 2017 |
R |
Ben Carson |
US Secretary of the Interior - Mar 01, 2017 |
R |
Ryan Zinke |
US Secretary of Commerce - Feb 27, 2017 |
NPA |
Reject |
EPA Administrator - Feb 17, 2017 |
R |
Scott Pruitt |
US Secretary of the Treasury - Feb 13, 2017 |
R |
Steve Mnuchin |
US Secretary of Health and Human Services - Feb 10, 2017 |
NPA |
Reject |
US Attorney General - Feb 08, 2017 |
R |
Jeff Sessions |
US Secretary of State - Feb 01, 2017 |
R |
Rex W. Tillerson |
WV Governor - D Primary - May 10, 2016 |
R |
Jim Justice |
US Commissioner of Food & Drugs - Feb 24, 2016 |
NPA |
Reject |
US Attorney General - Apr 23, 2015 |
D |
Loretta Lynch |
C.I.A. Director - Mar 07, 2013 |
N |
John O. Brennan |
WV Governor - Nov 05, 1996 |
R |
Cecil H. Underwood |
FEC COMMITTEES |
C00486563 |
|
$ 9706928.00 |
|