|
Bush vs. Gore - Who Won Florida?
Posted October 28, 2007 at 03:00pm by Chronicler
As you all know, the winner of Florida in the 2000 presidential election was not certain. After the state legislature threatened to use its legal authority to appoint Electors, thus ending the dispute, Gore dropped his case.
The Knight-Ridder newspapers hired BDO Seidman to tally the overvotes and undervotes. BDOS prepared a complicated set of tables setting forth all the possible ways of counting the votes. Some systems result in Bush winning, others result with Gore winning.
Undervotes
An "undervote" means that the ballot was not marked enough to be counted, as opposed to an "overvote," in which the voter voted for more than one candidate. The "undervote" tables were printed in USA Today on 4/4/2001.
BDOS analyzed 17,312 punch card ballots with undervotes. Of these, 14,940 had some indication of the voter's intent. Here is a table of the possibilities:
| Punch Card Undervotes in Florida 2000 |
| Description | Additional Bush Votes | Additional Gore Votes |
| Dimples: minimal mark on ballot | 6,718 | 5,530 |
| Pinpricks: chads have minor border punch | 596 | 503 |
| One Corner | 71 | 50 |
| Two Corners | 248 | 138 |
| Three Corners | 476 | 215 |
| Clean punch | 193 | 123 |
| Hand-Marked (pencil) | 37 | 42 |
My analysis: I would not count dimples, pinpricks, or one-corner chads. The clean punch ballots were not initially counted, but apparently the chads fell off afterwards. They were probably all 3-corner chads initially. I normally would not count hand-marked, but in the cases in the table the intent of the voter was clear so I would count them.
As far as the two-corner chad ballots go, I would not mind counting them if the decision were made before any ballots were counted. Otherwise I would not count them. The standard needs to be set before the counting begins.
BDOS analyzed 3,549 undervotes on optical-scan ballots. Of these, 1,861 had some indication of the intent of the voter. Here is a table of these undervotes:
| Optical Scan Undervotes in Florida 2000 |
| Description | Additional Bush Votes | Additional Gore Votes |
| Oval incorrectly marked | 246 | 341 |
| Name of Candidate Circled (oval not colored in) | 182 | 330 |
| Wrong pencil type used | 189 | 139 |
| Oval Circled | 94 | 136 |
| Underlined Candidate Name | 32 | 40 |
| Miscellaneous | 32 | 50 |
Deciding on the optical scan ballots is more difficult. Gore wins more votes in most categories. These votes were not counted because the voter did not follow the directions. I would normally recommend that using the wrong pencil and circling the bubble not be counted.
Overvotes
The study analyzed 111,261 overvotes. Of these, only 3% could possibly be considered valid votes. The complication: if a voter chooses Gore and Buchanan (the most common combination), which was the voter's preference?
| Overvotes Per Candidate |
| Candidate | Overvotes | % of Overvotes |
| Gore (D) | 84,197 | 76% |
| Bush (R) | 37,731 | 34% |
| Buchanan (Rf) | 36,756 | 33% |
| Browne (Lbt) | 32,495 | 29% |
| Moorehead (WW) | 28,797 | 26% |
| Hagelin (NL) | 28,686 | 26% |
| Phillips (Cst) | 28,396 | 26% |
| Nader (G) | 28,303 | 25% |
| Harris (SW) | 28,147 | 25% |
| McReynolds (Soc) | 23,958 | 22% |
| Write-ins | 5,010 | 5% |
The following table sets forth the 20 most common types of overvotes. Since many of these overvotes were cast on the "butterfly" ballot, I have grouped them: the left column shows one vote for a candidate on each leaf, while the right column shows votes for two or more candidates on the same page of the ballot.
| Types of Overvotes, Florida 2000 |
| One Candidate on each page | Two Candidates on Same Page |
| Gore-Buchanan 10,234 | Gore-Browne 9,321 |
| Bush-Buchanan 4,957 | Bush-Gore 8,956 |
| Gore-Moorehead 3,989 | Gore-Nader 3,405 |
| Gore-McReynolds 3,976 | All Candidates except Bush 3,007 |
| Gore-Phillips 3,868 | Gore-Harris 1,782 |
| Gore-Hagelin 3,015 | Bush-Browne 1,711 |
| Bush-Hagelin 2,442 | Bush-Nader 1,529 |
| Bush-Phillips 2,047 | Gore + write-in 1,292 |
| Bush-Moorehead 1,771 | All candidates (!) 957 |
| | Gore + 4 others 911 |
| | Bush + write-in 790 |
| [Total of above: 36,299] | [Total of above: 33,661] |
| All Other Overvotes: 41,301 |
This table shows that the common complaint about the ballot is somewhat overrated. The 20 most common overvote errors are about equally divided between voting for multiple candidates on the same page and voting for one candidate on each page.
Note: The left page of the ballot had Bush, Gore, Browne, Nader, Harris, and Hagelin. The right page had Buchanan, McReynolds, Phillips, Moorehead, and the write-in option. Some counties had Hagelin on the second page.
Overvote details: Voters in Duval County cast 21,188 overvotes, or 1/5 of the total. Of these, 55% voted for one candidate on each page. Palm Beach County's butterfly ballot was the recipient of 18,748 overvotes. Gore received 80% of the overvotes there to 20% for Bush. Half of the Gore-Buchanan overvotes in the state were cast here.
The following is a table of the BDOS account of the 3% of ballots where the voters' intents were somewhat discernable:
| Overvote Breakdown |
| Type of Overvote | Clearly for Bush | Clearly for Gore |
| Attempted Corrections | 530 | 863 |
| Write-in Corrections | 606 | 921 |
| Write-in Blank | 53 | 87 |
Of the three in the table, I would not count the third column.
Result
Deciding how to adjust the total involves making two decisions: how to count hanging chads and how to determine the intent of a voter who did not follow directions. Should a vote be counted in the latter case or not? I would favor either position if the decision is made before counting begins.
You can see that there is a number of ways in which either Bush or Gore could have won Florida in 2000. If my preferences are followed, Gore wins by a margin of 2,915,088 to 2,915,060.
|
Right Column |