Home About Chat Users Issues Party Candidates Polling Firms Media News Polls Calendar Key Races United States President Senate House Governors International

New User Account
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource." 
Email: Password:

  NJ Public Question No. 2
RACE DETAILS
Parents > United States > New Jersey > Public Questions > 2012 Public Questions > Judge Salaries
OfficeConstitutional Amendment
HonorificConstitutional Amendment - Abbr:
Type Referendum
Filing Deadline 00, 2012 - 12:00pm Central
Polls Open November 06, 2012 - 05:00am Central
Polls Close November 06, 2012 - 07:00pm Central
Term Start November 07, 2012 - 12:00pm
Term End December 31, 9999 - 12:00pm
ContributorMr. Matt
Last ModifiedWSNJ May 30, 2020 05:03pm
Data Sources[Link]
Description
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ALLOWING CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM JUSTICES’ AND JUDGES’ SALARIES FOR THEIR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Do you approve an amendment to the New Jersey Constitution, as agreed to by the Legislature, to allow contributions set by law to be taken from the salaries of Supreme Court Justices and Superior Court Judges for their employee benefits?

INTERPRETIVE STATEMENT
This amendment clarifies the Legislature’s authority to pass laws requiring contributions be taken from the salaries of Supreme Court Justices and Superior Court Judges for their employee benefits. These benefits include their pension and health care coverage.

The amendment responds to a question raised in a 2011 lawsuit filed by a judge after the Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law P.L.2011, c.78. That law increased the contributions taken from current and future justices’ and judges’ salaries for their benefits, starting in October 2011. The lawsuit, which was appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court, argued against taking the higher contributions from currently appointed justices and judges, citing language in the Constitution that their salaries cannot be reduced during their appointed terms.

The amendment clarifies that such contributions, set by law, may be taken from justices’ and judges’ salaries during their terms. It would also allow for the higher contributions set by P.L.2011, c.78 to be deducted

[More...]
LEANING PREDICTIONS    Detail
Leaning Graph
11/01/2012 11/06/2012
CandidateSlightLeanStrongSafe
Yes ------1
Leaning Call: Yes (100.00%)
Weighted Call: Yes (100.00%)
MATCHUP POLL GRAPH
Poll Graph

09/27/2012 09/30/2012

CANDIDATES
Photo  
Name Yes No  
PartyYES NO  
Campaign Logo  
Certified Votes 1,982,406 (83.15%) 401,606 (16.85%)  
Margin0 (0.00%) -1,580,800 (-66.31%)  
Predict Avg.0.00% 0.00%  
Cash On Hand $-- $--  
Website  
Entry Date 00/00/2012 00/00/2012  
Bar
MATCHUP POLLS (1 from 1 pollsters)
Adj Poll Avg68.33%-- 19.67%--  
Eagleton Poll (Rutgers Univ.) 
09/27/12-09/30/12
70.00% -- 18.00% --
ENDORSEMENTS
Endorsements
 


EVENTS
Start Date End Date Type Title Contributor

VIDEO ADVERTISEMENTS
Start Date Candidate Category Ad Tone Lng Title Run Time Contributor

BOOKS
Title Purchase Contributor

INFORMATION LINKS

NEWS
Date Category Headline Article Contributor

DISCUSSION