|
|
"A historical political resource."
|
Site Programming Change Suggestion
| DISCUSSION |
| [View All 981 Previous Messages] |
|
WmP:879 | Chronicler ( 82.2147 points)
 x2
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 02:19:26 AM UTC0:00
|
Sorry about taking Iceland - I hope you don't take it personally. It was not intended that way.
Sorry about taking Iceland - I hope you don't take it personally. It was not intended that way.
|
|
|
Veg:334 | Thomas Walker ( 591.1573 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 02:25:18 AM UTC0:00
|
This game seemed a lot more fun this morning than it does now!
I wish Vatican City were in play (not that I would ever take control of Italy).
This game seemed a lot more fun this morning than it does now!
I wish Vatican City were in play (not that I would ever take control of Italy).
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 02:26:49 AM UTC0:00
|
Vatican City is in play.
Vatican City is in play.
|
|
|
Veg:334 | Thomas Walker ( 591.1573 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 02:30:31 AM UTC0:00
|
My mistake. Well, I guess after everyone else here beats me up, I can go and get smacked around by the Pope some.
My mistake. Well, I guess after everyone else here beats me up, I can go and get smacked around by the Pope some.
|
|
|
D:2109 | Andy ( 4160.6357 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 02:33:15 AM UTC0:00
|
I think I still control Greenland, but it's listed as "undefined" on the world map...do I still control Greenland?
I think I still control Greenland, but it's listed as "undefined" on the world map...do I still control Greenland?
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 02:34:34 AM UTC0:00
|
It shouldn't be showing as undefined after the fix I did at 5:43pm.
It shouldn't be showing as undefined after the fix I did at 5:43pm.
|
|
|
D:2064 | TX DEM ( 3224.4231 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 04:51:42 AM UTC0:00
|
If you control 1 country is the formula 2+(1/3) = 3?
If you control 1 country is the formula 2+(1/3) = 3?
|
|
|
|
D:1414 | Forwardista ( 171.5051 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 04:53:00 AM UTC0:00
|
The number of armies earned is 2+(#countries/3 rounded up).
The number of armies earned is 2+(#countries/3 rounded up).
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 04:53:32 AM UTC0:00
|
Yes. It is now always rounded up.
Yes. It is now always rounded up.
|
|
|
D:2064 | TX DEM ( 3224.4231 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 04:54:56 AM UTC0:00
|
Agh. I thought it was like .666 rounded up only. But I'm not on Berlin Road, so I guess I was wrong.
Agh. I thought it was like .666 rounded up only. But I'm not on Berlin Road, so I guess I was wrong.
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 04:56:31 AM UTC0:00
|
Technically it is 2+int((#countries/3)+0.9)
Technically it is 2+int((#countries/3)+0.9)
|
|
|
D:8172 | La Fayette ( 56.1717 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 01:22:33 PM UTC0:00
|
I hate such pitiful failures.
I hate such pitiful failures.
|
|
|
SAP:262 | Gaear Grimsrud ( 6920.2134 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 03:24:18 PM UTC0:00
|
Question: if you have troops on a country, and are then given new, unplaced armies 24 hours later, does that mean you can only attack bordering countries with those new, unplaced armies?
Question: if you have troops on a country, and are then given new, unplaced armies 24 hours later, does that mean you can only attack bordering countries with those new, unplaced armies?
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 05:00:13 PM UTC0:00
|
Question: if you have troops on a country, and are then given new, unplaced armies 24 hours later, does that mean you can only attack bordering countries with those new, unplaced armies?
Yep.
Gaear Grimsrud:
Question: if you have troops on a country, and are then given new, unplaced armies 24 hours later, does that mean you can only attack bordering countries with those new, unplaced armies?
Yep.
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 05:35:04 PM UTC0:00
|
Sorry, I plan on getting to all those little countries I missed as soon as I can.
Sorry, I plan on getting to all those little countries I missed as soon as I can.
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 05:36:20 PM UTC0:00
|
Gave you armies back.
Gave you armies back.
|
|
|
SAP:262 | Gaear Grimsrud ( 6920.2134 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 05:43:08 PM UTC0:00
|
Gave you armies back.
I appreciate it, thanks.
RP: Gave you armies back.
I appreciate it, thanks.
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 06:12:05 PM UTC0:00
|
Lowered the cost of Ports to 5 armies. Also thinking about Troop Carriers at cost of 3 armies and Cruisers at 4 armies.
Lowered the cost of Ports to 5 armies. Also thinking about Troop Carriers at cost of 3 armies and Cruisers at 4 armies.
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 06:14:43 PM UTC0:00
|
Poll on OC Games:
Poll on OC Games:
|
|
|
Veg:334 | Thomas Walker ( 591.1573 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 06:37:34 PM UTC0:00
|
I need the option :
They detract from the focus of the site, but I still support More OC games!
I need the option :
They detract from the focus of the site, but I still support More OC games!
|
|
|
D:704 | John ( 3346.7625 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 07:25:43 PM UTC0:00
|
Yeah, I agree with Thomas-they may be distracting, but are still fun and definitely something I'd support expanding.
Yeah, I agree with Thomas-they may be distracting, but are still fun and definitely something I'd support expanding.
|
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 3311.3784 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 07:28:59 PM UTC0:00
|
The "They detract from the focus of the site." is meant for people who don't want any games on the site. I do realize that even if you really like them, they will cause a little distraction from the site's focus.
The "They detract from the focus of the site." is meant for people who don't want any games on the site. I do realize that even if you really like them, they will cause a little distraction from the site's focus.
|
|
|
D:2064 | TX DEM ( 3224.4231 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 07:38:11 PM UTC0:00
|
I agree with Thomas so I selected yes to territories, no to more games.
I agree with Thomas so I selected yes to territories, no to more games.
|
|
|
I:6738 | IndyGeorgia ( 1064.3835 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 09:25:16 PM UTC0:00
|
What are some of the "other games" being considered?
What are some of the "other games" being considered?
|
|
|
D:2109 | Andy ( 4160.6357 points)
|
Thu, February 2, 2012 09:27:01 PM UTC0:00
|
As skeptical as I was of this at first, I think this (and perhaps a few other OC games) might end up attracting more people to the site, which could potentially be a very good thing.
An interesting idea for a future politically-relevant game, in my opinion, would be something like the old DOS game President Elect (except, obviously, completely different and not related in any way to that game).
As skeptical as I was of this at first, I think this (and perhaps a few other OC games) might end up attracting more people to the site, which could potentially be a very good thing.
An interesting idea for a future politically-relevant game, in my opinion, would be something like the old DOS game President Elect (except, obviously, completely different and not related in any way to that game).
|
|
|
|
|