|
|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
George W Bush: was he really that bad?
|
|---|
| Parent(s) |
Candidate
|
| Contributor | Scott³ |
| Last Edited | Scott³ Apr 15, 2013 10:41am |
| Logged |
0
|
| Category | Opinion |
| Author | Alex Spillius |
| Media | Newspaper - Daily Telegraph |
| News Date | Monday, April 15, 2013 04:40:00 PM UTC0:0 |
| Description | "It is George W Bush’s particular achievement to be disliked by both sides in American politics.
Democrats of course excoriate the damage done to the budget by waging two wars while cutting taxes, his conduct after Hurricane Katrina and his shoot from the hip style, not to mention that fact that he presided over the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression.
His own Republican party utterly rejected him during the 2012 campaign. Tea Party types saw him as a big-spender guilty of extending federal government, while few who once stood with him were prepared to defend his military achievements.
But presidents tend to look better, or at least different, from a distance, and with the opening of his presidential centre in Texas, there are suggestions that Bush the younger may be more fondly remembered than was thought possible when he left the White House in January 2009 as the most unpopular president in living memory." |
| Share |
|
|
2¢
|
|
| Article | Read Full Article |
|
| Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|
