PC:549 | kal ( -57.2262 points)
|
Tue, February 19, 2013 03:06:24 AM UTC0:00
|
Of all the magazines to have a circulation problem, this is one of the more surprising.
A few years ago, it was bought by a "liberal" media group. There was some fear that it would become more politicized. IMO, it hasn't. It still seemed to be the same magizine it was before that ownership change.
The biggest reason I thought Readers Digest would be more, but not totally, immune from the internet is because it's a good bathroom book.
Obviously I was wrong. I guess a lot of people surf the net while on the pot....
Of all the magazines to have a circulation problem, this is one of the more surprising.
A few years ago, it was bought by a "liberal" media group. There was some fear that it would become more politicized. IMO, it hasn't. It still seemed to be the same magizine it was before that ownership change.
The biggest reason I thought Readers Digest would be more, but not totally, immune from the internet is because it's a good bathroom book.
Obviously I was wrong. I guess a lot of people surf the net while on the pot....
|