|
|
"A historical political resource."
|
House votes down stopping employers asking for Facebook passwords
|
| Parent(s) |
Issue
|
| Contributor | RP |
| Last Edited | RP Mar 29, 2012 11:22am |
| Logged |
1
[Older]
|
| Category | Proposed Legislation |
| News Date | Thursday, March 29, 2012 04:45:00 AM UTC0:0 |
| Description | House Republicans today defeated an amendment introduced yesterday that would have banned employers demanding access to Facebook accounts. While the practice isn’t widespread, it has caused a big brouhaha after reports surfaced that some organizations were requiring workers to hand over Facebook passwords as a condition of keeping their current job or getting hired for a new one. |
| Share |
|
| Article | Read Article |
| DISCUSSION |
| [View All 21 Previous Messages] |
|
D:478 | Bob ( 2253.6577 points)
|
Fri, March 30, 2012 09:32:17 PM UTC0:00
|
The argument could be made that something you post on Facebook could be detrimental to your company if it's considered reflective of their employees, which for PR terms is probably worse than employing a heroin junkie who takes four-hour naps in the men's room on his lunch break behind closed doors.
The argument could be made that something you post on Facebook could be detrimental to your company if it's considered reflective of their employees, which for PR terms is probably worse than employing a heroin junkie who takes four-hour naps in the men's room on his lunch break behind closed doors.
|
|
|
|
I suppose it depends on how one defines "damaging" in regards to job performance. Personal behavior becoming highly embarrassing for your employer has always been a reason for dismissal.
If something is on a Facebook page but does not become widely known, does that qualify as embarrassing enough?
I suppose it depends on how one defines "damaging" in regards to job performance. Personal behavior becoming highly embarrassing for your employer has always been a reason for dismissal.
If something is on a Facebook page but does not become widely known, does that qualify as embarrassing enough?
|
|
|
R:8516 | Spen ( 128.4489 points)
|
Sat, March 31, 2012 09:49:41 PM UTC0:00
|
So where's the poll option for those of us who don't have a Facebook page?
So where's the poll option for those of us who don't have a Facebook page?
|
|
|
I can't imagine not having facebook. I used to be really half-assed with it, but once I started using it regularly I became addicted.
I can't imagine not having facebook. I used to be really half-assed with it, but once I started using it regularly I became addicted.
|
|
|
PC:549 | kal ( -57.2262 points)
|
Sat, March 31, 2012 11:32:38 PM UTC0:00
|
If the entire purpose of a password is privacy, why should any legislation be restricted to banning a requirement to divulge a password be restricted to a single web site?
It seems to me the responsible thing would be to vote against THIS bill.
Except for extremely sensitive roles like the FBI and CIA...etc, an employer has no need to know my password to any account.
If the entire purpose of a password is privacy, why should any legislation be restricted to banning a requirement to divulge a password be restricted to a single web site?
It seems to me the responsible thing would be to vote against THIS bill.
Except for extremely sensitive roles like the FBI and CIA...etc, an employer has no need to know my password to any account.
|
|
|
|
D:1414 | Forwardista ( 171.5051 points)
|
Sun, April 1, 2012 12:57:19 AM UTC0:00
|
I use Facebook as e-mail basically. It would be less invasive if they opened my mail.
I use Facebook as e-mail basically. It would be less invasive if they opened my mail.
|
|
|
Its not strictly speaking a question of give the Facebook password, or not take the job ("live in poverty"). In a statistically significant number of instances, handing over one's Facebook password would pretty much ensure one wouldn't be hired anyway from a varying range of jobs (one obvious example that should hit home at this site is that with all the political polarization in this country, a lot of people with strong political views aren't going to hire someone with the opposing set of views, because they see anyone like that as "an asshole," and they don't want to hire "an asshole"). That's the real issue here ie., that corporate America can use Facebook as a tool to intellectually cleanse, as it were, any segment of the population they find undesirable, whether it be labor union enthusiasts, Christian Fundamentalists, or what-have-you.
Its not strictly speaking a question of give the Facebook password, or not take the job ("live in poverty"). In a statistically significant number of instances, handing over one's Facebook password would pretty much ensure one wouldn't be hired anyway from a varying range of jobs (one obvious example that should hit home at this site is that with all the political polarization in this country, a lot of people with strong political views aren't going to hire someone with the opposing set of views, because they see anyone like that as "an *******," and they don't want to hire "an *******"). That's the real issue here ie., that corporate America can use Facebook as a tool to intellectually cleanse, as it were, any segment of the population they find undesirable, whether it be labor union enthusiasts, Christian Fundamentalists, or what-have-you.
|
|
|
R:7878 | Miro ( 238.3831 points)
|
Fri, April 6, 2012 03:42:57 AM UTC0:00
|
I'm surprised I haven't seen this brought up more.
You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.
- FaceBook Terms of Services
I'm surprised I haven't seen this brought up more.
You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.
- FaceBook Terms of Services
|
|
|
|
I'm surprised I haven't seen this brought up more. You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account. - FaceBook Terms of Services
Good catch! Let's see if anyone runs with it.
Miro: I'm surprised I haven't seen this brought up more. You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account. - FaceBook Terms of Services
Good catch! Let's see if anyone runs with it.
|
|
|
|
|