|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
Winning the argument
|
Parent(s) |
Race
|
Contributor | RP |
Last Edited | RP Dec 08, 2011 01:36pm |
Logged |
0
|
Category | Advertisement |
Author | Greg Sargent |
Media | Newspaper - Washington Post |
News Date | Thursday, December 8, 2011 04:50:00 PM UTC0:0 |
Description | Just one more quick point about that new poll casting doubt on whether efforts to tar Elizabeth Warren with Occupy Wall Street are working.
A few weeks ago, the Rove-founded Crossroads GPS spent six figures on an ad that was all about Occupy Wall Street, falsely insinuating that Warren supports protesters’ violence and slamming the protests for advocating “radical redistribution of wealth.”
Today, with Warren edging into a lead over Scott Brown, Crossroads GPS is out with a new spot that doesn’t mention Occupy Wall Street at all, and actually tars Warren as too cozy with the big banks at the expense of the middle class:
But put aside all this obvious absurdity. The real key here is that Crossroads went from attacking Warren as too close to Occupy Wall Street, to attacking her as too helpful to, and too cozy with, the big banks.
What does that tell you about who’s winning the argument? |
Share |
|
2¢
|
|
Article | Read Full Article |
|
Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|