|
|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
Memories of Islamophobia Past: Dubai Ports World
|
|---|
| Parent(s) |
Issue
|
| Contributor | DEPolitics |
| Last Edited | DEPolitics Aug 20, 2010 01:25pm |
| Logged |
2
[Older]
|
| Category | Commentary |
| Author | David Weigel |
| News Date | Friday, August 20, 2010 07:00:00 PM UTC0:0 |
| Description | Talking to a Republican strategist just now, I heard three words that I hadn't thought about in a very long time. Let's see if you remember them:
Dubai Ports World.
Remember that? In 2006, for a few weeks, there was no more important issue in America than that of a company owned by the United Arab Emirates securing a deal to run security at a few U.S. ports. In the beginning, there were only some quiet complaints about the deal. But on Feb. 13 it became an outrage, in large part because of a rally Chuck Schumer held with 9/11 family members. I'm just going to go ahead and quote the title of Schumer's press release:
Joined By Outraged 9-11 Families, Schumer Calls On President To Personally Intervene To Override Secret Committee’s Deal To Give United Arab Emirates Control Of Our Ports
Go back and read contemporary reporting and you see familiar faces like Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., then chairman of the House Homeland Security committee, worrying that the the rules governing the deal "don't address theunderlying conditions, which is how are they going to guard againstthings like infiltration by al Qaeda or someone else." Schumer, too, speculated about terrorists infiltrating the Dubai Ports World apparatus.
This chewed up news cycles for days. Bush, on track to lose his congressional majorities, sounded naive and helpless. "In orderto win the war on terror, " he said during the furor, "we have got to strengthen our relationshipsand friendships with moderate Arab countries in the Middle East. UAE is a committed ally in the war on terror. They are a keypartner for our military in a critical region." He sounded like Obama does now.
There's no one-to-one comparison here, because the ports deal involved international corporations and national security. But you had a very familiar response to those complications: politicians simplifying the situation and pandering to suspicion and mistrust of Muslims.
|
| Share |
|
|
2¢
|
|
| Article | Read Full Article |
|
| Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
|
|
