Home About Chat Users Issues Party Candidates Polling Firms Media News Polls Calendar Key Races United States President Senate House Governors International

New User Account
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource." 
Email: Password:

  Judge Blocks New Nebraska Abortion Screening Law
NEWS DETAILS
Parent(s) Issue 
ContributorBrandonius Maximus 
Last EditedBrandonius Maximus  Jul 14, 2010 01:40pm
Logged 0
CategoryLegal Ruling
AuthorAP
MediaTV News - Columbia Broadcasting System CBS News
News DateWednesday, July 14, 2010 07:00:00 PM UTC0:0
Description(AP) A federal judge on Wednesday blocked a new Nebraska law requiring mental health screenings for women seeking abortions because the measure could have made it impossible to get an abortion in the state.

U.S. District Judge Laurie Smith Camp granted Planned Parenthood of the Heartland's request for a preliminary injunction against the law, which was supposed to take effect Thursday. The order will prevent the state from enforcing the law until the lawsuit challenging it is decided.

Planned Parenthood said the law could be difficult to comply with and requires doctors to give information irrelevant to abortions.

State officials have said it is designed to make sure women understand the risks and complications that may accompany an abortion.

Officials with Planned Parenthood and the Nebraska Attorney General's officials were not immediately available to comment after the ruling was released Wednesday morning.

Smith Camp said the evidence presented so far showed that the screening law would make it harder for women to get an abortion in Nebraska by requiring screenings that could be impossible to perform under a literal reading of the law. She also said the law would make doctors who perform abortions at risk of crippling lawsuits.

"The effect of LB 594 will be to place substantial, likely insurmountable, obstacles in the path of women seeking abortions in Nebraska," Smith Camp said.

The judge said Planned Parenthood's arguments that the law was vague and could be cumbersome were persuasive, and the potential harm the law could do made a preliminary injunction appropriate.

"Plaintiffs have presented substantial evidence that the disclosures mandated by LB 594, if applied literally, will require medical providers to give untruthful, misleading and irrelevant information to patients," Smith Camp said in her ruling.
Share
ArticleRead Full Article

NEWS
Date Category Headline Article Contributor

DISCUSSION